Employment 2022

Last Updated July 06, 2022

Poland

Law and Practice

Authors



Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP is one of the top law firms in Poland, offering a broad range of services and tax and legal expertise. The Warsaw office has more than 20 years' experience in advising clients. The employment practice supports clients operating in all sectors of the economy, both in Poland and abroad, and offers them legal advice in all aspects of employment law. The advice covers the following areas: employment aspects of M&A as well as cross-border mergers, including the transfer of employment establishments to new employers, and employee participation rights; restructuring of employment, including group redundancies; issues related to unionised and non-unionised employees; representing employers in negotiations with trade unions, collective disputes and disputes with employees, both inside and outside the courts; cross-border employment and the employment of citizens of EU and non-EU member states in Poland, including work and residency permits; and compliance, mobbing and discrimination-related issues.

In addition to a number of measures related to the war in Ukraine, which were purely of a temporary nature, there have also been several other significant amendments in Polish employment law enacted within the past 12 months.

New Minimum Wage (2022)

The minimum monthly remuneration for an employee working under an employment contract in 2022 has been increased to PLN3,100 gross. In the case of civil law contracts, such as service contracts, the minimum wage has also been increased to PLN19.70 gross per hour. The tax threshold has also changed (the second tax threshold has been increased from PLN85,528 to PLN120,000 per annum).

Illegal and Improper Employment

Since 1 January 2022, an employee does not bear the consequences of illegal employment. An employer bears full responsibility. New rules of responsibility aim to eliminate illegal employment by encouraging employees to disclose illegal employment without being subject to legal consequences. An employer who employs workers illegally will be required to pay all social security contributions of illegally employed persons (ie, the employer's recourse claim against the employee has been waived). Both the remuneration and the contributions paid by the employer in the case that the employment is deemed illegal will not be deductible from the employer’s income tax.

Employment of Foreigners

Starting from 29 January 2022, a foreigner cannot be paid less than the minimum wage, regardless of the working time and the type of employment. The period for entrusting work to a foreigner without a work permit, on the basis of a declaration on entrusting work to foreigner, has been extended from six to 24 months. Also, a mandatory break between employment on the basis of a declaration on entrusting work has been eliminated. It applies to foreigners from Armenia, Georgia, Russia, Belarus, Moldova, and Ukraine. In addition, a temporary residence and work permit may be changed in more cases, for example when a foreigner decides to change employer during the validity of the residence permit granted for the purpose of performing work for the original employer.

Remuneration of Drivers

The implementation of the EU Mobility Package legislation provides for drivers to be covered by the provisions on the posting of workers. As of 2 February 2022, the most important effect of including drivers in the provisions on the posting of workers will be the obligation to apply employment conditions, including remuneration, according to the regulations of the country in which the work takes place. In addition, the regulations standardise a method of recording the working time of drivers, introducing the obligation to keep a separate official record of drivers' working time.

Amendments to the Act on Employee Capital Plans (PPK)

On 4 June 2022, the catalogue of employing entities has been extended to the payer of social security contributions in the case of employers without a tax identification number (NIP). This change will affect, for example, employees employed by foreign employers who have taken over the employer’s obligations to pay the social security obligations.

The amendment shortens the period after which an employee might be enrolled in a PPK; the employer will be entitled to conclude a PPK agreement on behalf of a newly hired employee even after 14 days from the date of employment.

COVID-19 Crisis

The epidemic state has been lifted and replaced by an epidemic emergency state. Almost all restrictions imposed on workplaces, including sanitary regulations and capacity limits, have been lifted.

Remote working

Employers in Poland are still entitled to instruct their employees to work remotely in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Employees cannot generally object to these instructions. Such COVID-19-related remote work, unlike remote work unrelated to COVID-19, does not require the employee’s consent. The implementation of COVID-19-related remote work is left to the employer’s discretion and depends on its assessment of the COVID-19-related risk in the workplace At the same time, the Polish parliament is working on the new provisions concerning remote work.

Temporary Reduction of Salaries

During the COVID-19 pandemic, employers that incurred an economic downturn due to COVID-19 can put some or all of their employees on economic stoppage (meaning that the employees are released from their obligation to work during this period), or shorten their working time by a maximum of 20%. The above changes can lead to a respective reduction of the salaries of the employees concerned.

The aforementioned measures must be introduced upon agreement with the relevant employees' representatives or trade unions, but the consent of each individual affected employee is not required.

Special Treatment for Ukrainian Citizens

Poland has taken a number of temporary measures to help Ukrainian citizens who left their homeland as a result of Russian aggression and entered Poland after 24 February 2022. They will be entitled to legally stay in Poland for a period of 18 months (ie, until 24 August 2023), and to work under simpler rules, without the need to apply for a work permit or other documents confirming the legal right to stay and work. Ukrainian citizens are also entitled to set up their own businesses. The residence and work permits of Ukrainian citizens issued before the war outbreak have been extended. An employer who entrusts work to an Ukrainian citizen is obliged to notify the Poviat Labour Office within 14 days from the date of commencement of work. The notification must include information on the minimum working conditions for refugees and provide data on the employer’s workforce (ie, information on number of employees employed under employment and/or civil law contracts) as of 23 February 2022 and the date of notification.

Upcoming Pending Amendments to Employment Law

Work on the regulation of remote working and employee sobriety checks is still underway. The new remote working rules will replace the existing and overly formal provisions concerning teleworking. The principle of remote work is to be carried out on the basis of an agreement between the employee and the employer. The law is also to regulate the settlement of remote working costs.

The Polish government is working on the implementation of Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law. The law will be designed to protect the so-called whistle-blowers in workplaces.

Work on the implementation of Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work-life balance for parents and carers and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU is pending. The proposed changes will affect issues relating to parental leave.

The right of employees to be offline outside working hours is also set to be regulated. The amendment is also intended to amend the provisions regarding the probationary period contract and the termination of fixed-term contracts.

In principle, Polish employment law does not stipulate a differentiation between blue-collar and white-collar workers. However, there are certain special provisions in the Labour Code that apply to executives, relating to overtime, maximum weekly working time and minimum rest periods; in particular:

  • employees who manage an employment establishment on behalf of their employer (ie, members of the management board) and heads of separate organisational sub-units of the organisation will, in so far as is necessary, perform work beyond normal working hours without the right to any additional remuneration for overtime;
  • employees who are heads of organisational sub-units have the right to additional remuneration for overtime work performed on Sundays and public holidays if they have not been given another rest day in return;
  • there is no obligation to keep the working time evidence for those employees who manage the employment establishment on behalf of their employer;
  • the limitation on the number of possible working hours per week (ie, a maximum of 48 hours together with overtime hours) does not apply to employees managing the workplace on behalf of their employer; and
  • the requirement to ensure at least 35 hours of uninterrupted rest every week, including at least 11 hours of uninterrupted daily rest, does not apply to employees managing the workplace on behalf of their employer.

Employment contracts should be concluded in writing; however, the lack of a written form will not make the contract invalid. If the agreement is not concluded in writing, the employer is obliged to at least provide the employee with a written confirmation of the employee's employment conditions prior to the commencement of their work. The failure to complete the above requirement triggers the employer's liability for committing an offence against the employee's rights, but does not cause the invalidity of the employment relationship. The written form requirement will also have been met if the document is signed electronically using a qualified electronic signature.

In Poland, employment agreements can be concluded for:

  • a probationary period (no longer than three months);
  • a fixed term; or
  • an indefinite period.

As a general rule, only three consecutive fixed-term contracts are permitted, and the period of employment under fixed-term contracts between the same parties cannot exceed 33 months. It is common practice to employ regular (non-senior-level) employees under an employment agreement for a probationary period (or fixed term) first and to conclude an agreement for an indefinite term afterwards. An employee in a senior-level position typically receives a permanent agreement for an indefinite period from the beginning of their employment.

The employment agreements must be in writing and in the Polish language unless the employee, if they are not a Polish citizen, requests that the execution of the employment agreement be in a different language.

The parties to the employment agreement are free to choose the law of another country to govern the employment relationship. However, if the work is to be performed in Poland, certain employee entitlements, as imposed under Polish law, would need to be recognised by an employer anyway.

Generally, the working time limit amounts to eight hours a day with an average of 40 hours a week, within an average five-day working week (the basic reference period amounts to four months) subject to extraordinary working time systems that include certain extensions. The limit, including overtime work, amounts to an average of 48 hours a week within the adopted reference period.

There are also provisions that guarantee the minimum daily and weekly rest periods (a minimum of 11 hours per day and 35 hours once a week) and the prohibition of work on Sundays/public holidays (subject to certain exceptions). These limits can be modified based on the system and work time schedule adopted.

Overtime work is, in principle, permitted for the employer's justified needs or a rescue action. Overtime should not exceed 150 hours annually, but the employer can modify this to up to 416 hours.

For overtime work, employees are entitled to their regular remuneration plus 50% or 100% additional compensation. Instead of overtime compensation, the employer can grant the employee time off. In the situation concerning employees who regularly work outside the office and whose working time cannot be subject to an employer’s control, it is possible to stipulate a lump-sum overtime compensation corresponding to the estimated amount of overtime work.

The parties are free to agree the amount of remuneration. However, the remuneration cannot be lower than the officially announced minimum wage. This minimum wage for employees is established and adjusted every year by the government. As of 2022, it amounts to PLN3,100 a month for full-time employment.

The payment of a variable salary is not regulated in the statutes but is rather a matter of negotiations between the parties to the employment agreement.

Holiday Leave

An employee is entitled to:

  • 20 days of holiday leave per year – if they have been employed for less than ten years, in general; or
  • 26 days of holiday leave per year – if they have been employed for more than ten years, in general.

Periods of previous employment, even with a different entity, are included in the work record on which the length of the holiday leave depends. In addition, education periods are included in the work record on which the length of the holiday leave depends. During a holiday leave, the employee is entitled to regular pay as if they were working. An employee cannot give up their right to holiday leave. Cash payment in lieu of unused holiday is possible but only in the case of a termination or the expiry of employment.

Sickness Leave

Generally, employees on sick leave are entitled to sick pay in the amount specified by law, which is equal to 80% (or 100% in the case of pregnant employees, or sickness caused by an occupational accident) of their remuneration calculated in general on the basis of the salary received for the 12 consecutive months preceding the period of their incapacity to work.

In general, for the first 33 days of sick leave, the above-mentioned sick pay is paid by the employer, and afterwards the payment obligation is taken over by the state (ie, the Social Security Office). Absence from work due to sickness requires providing the employer with a sickness certificate issued by a doctor (either in paper or electronic form; the so-called e-ZLA).

Family-Friendly Rights

Parent employees are entitled to statutory leaves, including:

  • basic maternity leave – from 20 to 37 weeks (depending on the number of children born) (allowance equal to 100% of earnings);
  • parental leave – from 32 to 34 weeks (depending on the number of children born) (the first six to eight weeks’ allowance of 100% of earnings, and then 60%);
  • paternity leave – two weeks (allowance equal to 100% of earnings); and
  • additional parental leave – maximum of 36 months (unpaid).

The payments during the above-mentioned leaves are paid by the state (ie, the Social Security Office) and are calculated in the same manner as sick pay, meaning they are based, in general, on the salary received for the 12 consecutive months preceding the period of incapacity to work.

Confidentiality

The employee's basic duties, as stipulated in the Labour Code, include taking care of the interests of the employer, protecting its property, and maintaining the confidentiality of information the disclosure of which could expose the employer to damage, as well as observing the confidentiality obligations stipulated in the Act on Combating Unfair Competition. However, there are no direct statutory regulations concerning the post-employment period. Therefore, it is highly advisable to sign confidentiality agreements that would oblige the employee to keep their employer’s confidential information secret both during and after the termination of employment.

Liability Rules

The rules for employee liability for damage caused to their employer depend on whether the employee caused the damage intentionally or accidentally. If the damage sustained by the employer is caused by the employee accidentally as a result of the non-performance or undue performance of work duties, the employee’s liability is limited to the extent of the actual loss incurred by the employer. Moreover, the amount of damages cannot be more than three months’ salary. If the employee causes damage intentionally, they will be liable for the full amount of the damage.

If an employee causes damage to a third party in the performance of their employment duties, only the employer (not employee) is obliged to compensate for the damage.

PPK

A PPK is a mandatory additional long-term saving programme (co-funded by the employer, the employees, and partially by the state). The employer's compulsory minimum contribution rate is 1.5% of the employee’s remuneration. The enrolment into the pension plan is automatic for all employees of applicable age; however, employees have the right to opt out from it at any time. Failure to set up a PPK can result in fines imposed on the management board of the company amounting to up to 1.5% of the employer’s remuneration fund from the previous year.

Post-employment restrictive covenants can only apply to an employee who has access to particularly important information, the disclosure of which could expose the employer to damage. These clauses must be agreed in writing to be valid and must determine the time, place and scope of the non-compete undertaking. There is no statutory limit concerning the duration of a non-compete restriction, but typical post-termination bans last for three to 12 months. A non-compete will not be effective if it takes the form of an absolute ban on any activity in a particular industry; it must relate to an activity actually carried out by the entrepreneur (main or secondary) or planned (not a hypothetical possibility). Moreover, post-employment non-competition clauses must stipulate the amount of compensation payable to the employee for their compliance with the non-competition restriction. This compensation cannot be lower than 25% of the remuneration received by the employee prior to their termination of employment for the period equal to the period of the prohibition of competition. Compensation can be paid in monthly instalments.

If the employee violates a valid and enforceable non-compete clause, they become liable to pay damages to the employer. In practice, post-employment non-compete covenants are commonly combined with a contractual penalty that must be reasonable in relation to the employee’s compensation for the non-compete restriction. Furthermore, the employer can also be entitled to further damages if the damage caused by the employee exceeds the amount of the contractual penalty.

Non-solicitation clauses with reference to clients and customers are allowed under Polish law. These non-solicitation clauses typically cover the term of employment and/or a defined period after their termination (usually one to three years). Unlike post-employment non-competition covenants, Polish law does not require the employer to pay the employee any compensation for non-solicitation in order to be considered enforceable. Non-solicitation clauses concerning customers in certain circumstances can actually be considered to be non-competition clauses that require compensation.

In general, the processing of personal data in the employment sphere is subject to the provisions of the Labour Code, which was amended after the entry into force of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Employers should also keep in mind other regulations contained in various legal acts, which stipulate, for example, the storage limitation periods of certain documents containing employees’ personal data.

GDPR

The GDPR sets forth the general rules that should be followed by employers that act as data controllers of their employees’ personal data. According to these rules, employers should, among other things:

  • have a legal basis for data processing, and ensure that this processing is conducted in a fair and transparent manner in relation to the employees;
  • collect, use and process their employees’ personal data for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes, and should not further process such data in a manner that is incompatible with these purposes;
  • collect, use and process adequate and relevant personal data, which should be limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which it is processed;
  • keep accurate and up-to-date personal data of their employees;
  • keep personal data of their employees for no longer than is necessary for the purposes for which the personal data is processed; and
  • process personal data in a manner that ensures the appropriate security of the personal data, including protection against any unauthorised or unlawful processing, and against any accidental loss, destruction or damage by using the appropriate technical or organisational measures.

The Labour Code

The Labour Code sets forth certain restrictions with respect to the processing of employees’ personal data. In particular, employers are allowed to:

  • request from their employees only certain limited personal data that is expressly listed in the Labour Code, and other personal data but only if it is necessary in order to exercise rights or to fulfil an obligation arising from the provisions of law;
  • process employees’ personal data that does not constitute so-called special category data (eg, health data, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, or data revealing racial or ethnic origin) on the basis of the employees’ consent, but only when the lack of this consent or the withdrawal thereof does not cause disadvantageous treatment or negative consequences for the employees; in particular, it cannot constitute a reason justifying the refusal of employment, the termination of an employment contract with notice, or its termination without notice by an employer;
  • process employees’ personal data that falls within special category data, on the basis of consent, but only if this personal data has been provided upon an employee’s initiative;
  • process an employee’s biometric data, as well as in a situation where it is necessary to provide this data for the control of access to particularly important information, the disclosure of which could expose the employer to damage, or for access to premises requiring special protection; and
  • use monitoring that involves the processing of employees’ personal data only for certain purposes indicated in the Labour Code and only to a certain extent.

In general, there are no special requirements needed to perform work in Poland applicable to an EU/EEA/Swiss citizen.

In order for all other foreigners to be allowed to legally work in Poland, the below-mentioned conditions need to be fulfilled:

  • they must hold a document permitting them to enter the Polish labour market; and
  • they must hold a residence document that also indicates their right to work (eg, the relevant visa or residence permit; however, a tourist visa would be considered insufficient).

There are several types of documents that allow for entry into the Polish labour market:

  • a work permit (types A, B, C, D, or E) – applied for by the employer to the competent voivode; these types of work permits generally authorise work for up to three years;
  • a seasonal work permit (type S) – applied for by the employer to the competent starost (the Poviat Labour Office); this type of work permit authorises seasonal work (in agriculture, horticulture, the tourist industry), for up to nine months within a calendar year;
  • a declaration on entrusting work to a foreigner – submitted by the employer to the Poviat Labour Office for nationals from Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine; this type of work permit authorises non-seasonal work without a permit for 24 months; and
  • a temporary residence and work permit – applied for to the voivode by a foreigner who is staying in Poland legally; this type of work permit authorises the applicant to work and reside in Poland.

Please refer to 5.1 Limitations on the Use of Foreign Workers.

The right to establish and join a trade union is granted to employees, as well as civil law contractors. Establishing a trade union requires, among other things, the adoption of resolutions concerning the establishing of the trade union by at least ten people, the election of trade union authorities, the drawing up of the articles of association, and the union’s registration in the court register.

The trade union is obliged to notify the employer about the number of its members in the given entity twice a year (by 10 January and 10 July). There is no obligation to disclose the names of its members.

Trade unions, if present in a company, retain significant influence over the operations of the company; in particular, the employers are obliged:

  • to agree with the trade union on the remuneration, and social benefit fund by-laws (whenever they need to be adopted);
  • to consult with the trade unions about any anticipated termination of the employment agreements with employees who are members of said trade union, or are covered by the protection of the trade union as a non-member;
  • to consult/notify the trade unions in the case of an anticipated transfer of the work establishment; and
  • to consult/notify the trade unions in the case of any group lay-offs – with no right to block the dismissals.

Moreover, the trade unions can, under certain conditions, take strike action.

The creation of works councils is not obligatory in Poland; however, employers employing at least 50 employees are required to notify their employees that they are entitled to set up a works council. Works councils have consultation and information rights in matters concerning, among other things, changes in the employer’s economic situation, or any substantial changes in the work organisation and/or headcount.

Collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) can be concluded between the employer and the trade union (a single-establishment CBA), or between the employers' organisations and the intercompany trade unions (multi-establishment CBAs). The purpose of concluding a CBA is to agree on the comprehensive work conditions and terms of the employment relationship (eg, remuneration, additional benefits for employees, employment guarantees) and the mutual obligations of the parties. The terms of any collective bargaining agreements cannot be less favourable than the provisions of the Labour Code. A collective labour agreement directly affects the rights of employees covered by its provisions.

A CBA can be concluded for a definite or indefinite period. A CBA requires registration with the relevant register maintained by the competent state authority (the local labour inspector or the Ministry of Labour). The registration of a CBA is preceded by an examination of the legality of its provisions.

An employment contract can be terminated:

  • by mutual consent of the employee and employer (ie, via a mutual termination agreement);
  • upon written notice by one of the parties observing the period of notice (a so-called termination with notice);
  • upon written notice by one of the parties without observing the period of notice (a so-called termination without notice); or
  • after the expiry of the period for which it has been concluded.

An employer’s statement on the termination of an employment contract concluded for an indefinite period of time upon notice, as well as a statement on the termination of an employment contract without notice, should be in writing (ie, it requires a handwritten signature or a qualified electronic signature) and should stipulate the reasons for the termination. Furthermore, the employer’s statement concerning the termination should include information on the employee’s right to appeal to a labour court.

The reason for the termination must be valid, justifiable and real, but there is no legal definition or catalogue of the reasons justifying the termination of a contract. The above means that dismissals can be justified for employee-related reasons (such as poor performance) or for employer-related reasons (eg, liquidation, internal reorganisation). The reason for the termination must be sufficiently clear that the employee can easily comprehend it. The lack of any justified reason for termination is one of the grounds for an appeal against dismissal.

If an employee is protected by a trade union, the employer must inform the trade union of its intention to terminate the contract for an indefinite period.

In general, Polish law does not distinguish in the procedure between performance-related dismissals and dismissals for economic and/or technical reasons. However, the procedures differ in the case of a collective dismissal.

Collective Dismissals

Collective dismissals take place if the employer employs at least 20 employees and within a period of 30 days redundancies are made upon the employer’s initiative and are motivated by reasons not related to the employees (eg, a reduction in the workforce due to the employer’s financial situation) and concern at least:

  • ten employees, if the employer employs less than 100 employees;
  • 10% of the employees, if the employer employs at least 100 employees, but less than 300 employees; or
  • 30 employees, if the employer employs more than 300 employees.

The procedure for collective dismissals requires prior consultations with the trade unions (if there are any) or the employee representatives. No letters of dismissal can be handed out until after the consultation period has concluded. Moreover, the employer is required to notify the local labour office as to the outcome of any consultations with the employee representatives, as well as any planned redundancies.

Employees who are made redundant under a collective dismissals procedure are entitled to a severance payment, the amount of which varies between one and three months’ remuneration, depending on the employee’s total length of service with the employer. The severance pay is capped at the level of 15 times the statutory minimum salary in Poland. Severance pay is also due to those employees who have been dismissed for non-employee-related reasons, even if the number of dismissed employees does not fall under the thresholds stipulated for collective dismissals, provided the employer employs at least 20 employees.

The period of notice depends on the type of employment contract and the length of service with the given employer. Notice periods can only be extended for the benefit of the employee.

The statutory notice periods are as follows.

For indefinite-term and fixed-term employment contracts, if the employee has been employed:

  • for less than six months – the notice period is two weeks;
  • for six months, but less than three years – the notice period is one month; or
  • for at least three years – three months.

For probation contracts:

  • if the contract is for a period up to two weeks – the notice period is three days;
  • if the contract is for a period between two weeks and three months – the notice period is one week; or
  • if the contract is for a period of three months – the notice period is two weeks.

During the notice period, the employer can place the employee on gardening leave, and the employee will retain their right to remuneration during this time.

It is generally not possible to pay an employee compensation in lieu of notice. Only in cases of dismissals for non-employee-related reasons can the three-month notice period be shortened to one month against compensation.

During the notice period, the employee can be requested to use up their entire holiday leave or be paid an equivalent for any unused vacation.

An immediate termination due to an employee’s fault (summary dismissal) can take place only if the employee:

  • has seriously and intentionally – or by an act of gross negligence – violated their basic duties (a fundamental breach of the employee’s basic duties);
  • has committed an offence that makes the employee’s further employment in their position impossible, and providing this is obvious or confirmed by a final court verdict; or
  • is responsible for losing a licence or a qualification necessary to perform their duties in the position held.

Such termination is possible only within one month after learning about the circumstances justifying the immediate termination.

Under Polish law, an immediate termination by the employer is also possible in the case of a long-lasting incapacity to work due to illness (lasting longer than the joint period of receiving sick pay from the employer, statutory sickness benefit and rehabilitation benefit for the first three months).

Termination agreements are possible and are often the recommended way of terminating an employment relationship. In a termination agreement, the parties are free to determine the date of expiry of employment (ie, the notice periods do not apply), as well as agree on any other issues. The only restriction is that any waiver of the employee’s right to remuneration stipulated in such an agreement would not be valid. Termination agreements theoretically do not require a written form; however, from a practical point of view, it is recommended that they are executed in writing.

Under Polish law, certain employees enjoy special protection against dismissal, which means that their contracts of employment cannot be terminated upon notice. If notice is served, it will be effective; however, the employee would be able to challenge this in court.

The protection against dismissal specifically applies to:

  • employees absent from work due to holiday leave, maternity leave or parental leave;
  • pregnant employees;
  • the employee is at pre-retirement age (ie, four years before reaching retirement age); and
  • trade union officers or members of works councils.

The termination of a contract with trade union officers or members of works councils requires the permission of the management board of the relevant trade union organisation or works council. They are protected from dismissal not only during the term of their office, but also for one year after this term ends.

An employee can challenge their dismissal in a labour court if there was no justified reason for this dismissal or if the dismissal is otherwise faulty and breaches the law. Such an appeal can generally be submitted within 21 days of the date of receipt of the termination letter.

Employees dismissed with notice who have been employed for an indefinite period can demand that the court reinstate them to work, or can claim damages, whereas an employee hired under a definite-term contract can only claim damages. Employees dismissed without notice can claim for reinstatement to work, or for the payment of damages.

The value of damages for wrongful dismissal is limited by law; for instance, in the case of indefinite-term contracts, it can be generally awarded up to the amount of three months’ remuneration, but, and in the case of extended notice periods, the court can order damages corresponding to this extended notice period.

In the event of reinstatement to work, an employee would also be entitled to compensation for the loss of their remuneration during the term of being unemployed, but for not more than three months. This limitation of the amount of the compensation does not apply to certain categories of protected employees (eg, pregnant women, employees at pre-retirement age, or women on maternity leave) who are eligible for the aforementioned compensation for the entire period of their unemployment.

The courts are free to decide whether an employee will be reinstated to work or awarded damages depending on their assessment of the circumstances of a given case. In the situation of long-lasting proceedings, the courts often decide that reinstatement to work is no longer possible.

Grounds for Anti-discrimination Claims

Under Polish law, employees have equal rights for performing the same duties and should be treated equally in terms of:

  • the establishment of employment relationships;
  • the determination of the conditions of employment;
  • promotion and access to training courses aimed at improving professional qualifications; and
  • the termination of employment relationships.

The list of grounds on which employers cannot differentiate between workers is open-ended and includes gender, age, disability, race, religion, nationality, political beliefs, trade union membership, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, employment for a definite or indefinite period, or employment on a full-time or part-time basis.

Burden of Proof

The employee should indicate in the court on what grounds they have been discriminated against and indicate the circumstances demonstrating that they have been treated unequally on those grounds. It is sufficient that the employee substantiates their allegations that direct or indirect discrimination has occurred; whereas the burden of proving that the discrimination did not take place will rest with the employer, who will be obliged to prove that the differentiation between the employees has been motivated by objective reasons.

Claims

An employee who has faced any form of discrimination, harassment or sexual harassment is entitled to claim compensation from the employer, which cannot be lower than the minimum remuneration in Poland.

An employee can claim compensation for any damage suffered as a result of a breach of the principle of equal treatment, including the right to claim compensation for the difference in remuneration if it was too low as a result of the employer's discriminatory practices.

In addition, an employee has the possibility to terminate the employment contract with immediate effect due to a serious breach by the employer of its fundamental duties towards the employee. In this case, the employee will be entitled to compensation equal to the amount of remuneration corresponding to the notice period.

Labour disputes are typically resolved by the labour courts, which function within the Polish system of common courts. However, it is also possible to settle a dispute amicably by a mediator – for such a settlement to be binding, it will need to be approved by the court.

The professional legal representation of a party in a court is not mandatory in connection to labour law-related litigation. The parties are free to choose whether they represent themselves or ask for representation before the court from a licensed lawyer.

In labour matters, the parties can only enter into an arbitration agreement after the dispute arises. Unlike other types of relations, in labour matters it is not possible to agree in the employment contract that disputes arising between the employer and employee will be settled by an arbitration court. Such a provision would be invalid.

The procedural costs (court fees and costs for professional representation) are allocated in proportion to the outcome of the case. However, the costs for professional representation awarded by the court to the prevailing party typically do not correspond to the actual costs incurred but are determined based on statutory tariffs for employment matters. Any difference must be borne by the client.

Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP (Spółka partnerska) Oddział w Polsce

Pl. Trzech Krzyży 10/14
00-499 Warsaw
Poland

+48 22 529 29 00

+48 22 529 29 01

hoganlovells.warsaw@hoganlovells.com www.hoganlovells.com
Author Business Card

Trends and Developments


Authors



Linklaters is a leading global law firm, supporting clients in achieving their strategies wherever they do business. The Warsaw office is one of the largest law firms in Poland, offering a broad range of legal services across all major practice areas. The Warsaw team is part of Linklaters’ global employment practice, which allows it to provide seamless legal support to clients on multinational matters, in particular those requiring an innovative or unified approach across various jurisdictions, and to benefit from the experience gained across the international network. The team works on the most complex and sensitive employee relations issues, including executive exits, whistle-blowing allegations, restructuring and labour disputes and risk management. They also advise on various day-to-day HR matters. The team has vast experience advising various clients from a range of industries on many significant and complex matters in the Polish and European market.

A Wave of Change: What the Polish Labour Market May Expect Soon

In the next few months, a number of proposals for significant amendments to Polish employment law will be submitted for legislative work. The changes derive primarily from various labour market expectations resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic experience, certain market transformations as well as the requirements of transposing the so-called Work-Life Balance and Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions EU Directives into national law. The obligations of employing entities will also be affected once the belated local legislation transposing the whistle-blowing directive is adopted. As a result, employers in Poland will be challenged with many new responsibilities and will need to take structural decisions once the new laws are passed. This will result in additional burdens on HR departments as they prepare and adjust their organisations to the new legal reality. The exact timing of the upcoming changes has not yet been precisely set, with further delays to the work being announced. However, they are supposed to be adopted soon and are expected during autumn 2022.

The Continuously Evolving Remote Work Trend

It seems that the remote work revolution triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic has created a new context and entails not only work outside the traditional office environment in various configurations, but is also evolving into an agile, hybrid model of work, with cross-border remote employment. It has become a preference and even an expectation amongst a significant number of candidates who opt for remote work as opposed to the traditional model of work from the office. Even though certain businesses may favour office work, most of them needed to reprioritise their values to a certain extent or find various compromises to attract and retain talent.

Projected new standards for rules regarding remote work

Despite its provisional nature, the succinct special emergency COVID-19 remote work legislation has now become the standard legal basis for distance work in Poland. Various distance work arrangements, ranging from the permanent or hybrid model to the unpopular telework model, have been explored. However, in order to respond to the expectations of both employers and employees, more complex provisions are currently being prepared as draft amendments to Polish Labour Code. The new regulations will refresh the remote work format as an option under the employment relationship and will replace the current provisions on telework. Although work on the draft has been delayed, it is supposed to be passed in 2022.

The new draft law in its current shape stipulates that the principles of remote work should be specified in:

  • an agreement concluded between the employer and the relevant trade union (or in internal regulations by the employer if a common understanding cannot be reached with the union before the lapse of the prescribed negotiation period);
  • internal regulations issued by the employer, upon prior consultation with employee representatives elected in the manner adopted at the given entity (in the absence of an active trade union); or
  • an individual agreement concluded with the employee.

Additionally, unilateral remote work orders will be admissible under clearly defined circumstances.

In particular, it will be necessary to define and set up:

  • groups of employees admissible for remote work arrangements;
  • rules on how certain costs of remote work are covered by the employer, or rules on determining the cash equivalent or lump sum for specified costs borne by the employee in private premises in relation to the performance of remote work (which is a significant and financially burdensome novelty for the employer);
  • means of communication between the employer and the employee;
  • supervision over work performance;
  • audits; and
  • installation, inventory, maintenance, software updates and servicing of work tools entrusted to an employee.

Separately, the occasional and less formal home office option is also envisaged and is anticipated to cover a period not exceeding 24 days in a calendar year.

There are also additional formal requirements regarding compulsory paperwork and procedures. It should be noted that the draft regulations, in their current shape, provide for rigid (for the employer) rules of resignation from the implemented remote work model. Otherwise, the employer would need to serve the employee with an alteration notice of the terms and conditions of employment.

Also, the draft provides for certain exemptions from the general health and safety obligations on the part of the employer and reduces bureaucracy. Initial occupational health and safety training is to be allowed to be conducted electronically, and the responsibility for the proper organisation of remote work in terms of ergonomics will be shifted to the employee.

“Workation”: an HR headache

Workation is a new term that describes situations where an employee decides to temporarily and at their discretion perform work remotely from a location of their choice that is different from their regular place of residence (in their homeland or abroad). It used to be accessible for freelancers only, and can now be made available to other employees as well. It does, however, pose certain risks as regards the legal consequences of this set-up. Both workation and permanent remote work outside of the home country entail many pitfalls and grey areas regarding, inter alia, the applicable law, immigration requirements, local social security and taxation obligations, risks related to data processing and protection of confidential information, as well as organisational problems. Nevertheless, certain employers, in order to retain their competitiveness in the market, have decided to accept the risks or introduce solutions aimed at minimising them, in order to control and offer the workation option to its employees. However, the viability of this solution remains questionable.

New markets: finding remote employees abroad

Remote work also allows for cross-border employment, where the employee performs work from a location outside of the home country of the foreign employer, while being employed under a local employment relationship. This solution has opened new opportunities for certain companies regarding access to a qualified workforce.

Other Developments to Employment Law

Sobriety testing

Sobriety testing of employees has now been significantly limited due to official interpretations of data privacy laws. The long-awaited provisions on sobriety testing of employees by employers are to be adopted. Under these regulations (in their current form), the employer should be able to apply sobriety tests to employees for the presence of alcohol or other substances, when necessary to protect the life and health of employees or other people, or to protect property. The employer must ensure that certain formal requirements are fulfilled, including the introduction of respective provisions into work regulations. If the result of the test is positive, the employee may be suspended from performing work and/or made subject to a warning, reprimand, or financial penalty.

Towards transparent and predictable working conditions

Other developments in Polish employment law are rooted in the belated obligation to implement the so-called Transparent and Predictable Working Conditions Directive. Therefore, there will be a need to reshape current employer practices, with consequences for businesses, including:

  • an obligation of the employer to substantiate (provide a justification for) the termination of a fixed-term employment contract and consult regarding the intention to terminate such a contract with a union (if one is operating and represents the employee), which means that the procedure for terminating this type of contract will be the same as for an indefinite-term employment contract;
  • specific reshaping of the duration of probationary term employment contracts;
  • amended and broadened content of standard employment contract;
  • amended and broadened content of additional, statutory information on terms of employment delivered to the employee by the employer;
  • additional information obligations towards posted workers;
  • additional application and information opportunities for employees regarding the reshaping of their employment relationship and corresponding information obligations of the employer; and
  • restrictions on the prohibition of additional employment of the employee except for a non-compete covenant under statutory rules.

Work-life balance

The Work-Life Balance Directive should also be implemented into the Polish legal system soon (and also belatedly) and the projected provisions provide additional rights for parents and carers, including:

  • the right of the employee to be released from work due to vis maior with the right to half of the remuneration retained for two days or 16 hours each year;
  • an additional (non-payable) five days off per calendar year for employees to take care of family members or residents of the same household requiring care or support for serious medical reasons;
  • prolonged parental leave and entitlement of each parent to nine weeks of parental leave that cannot be assigned to the other parent in order to encourage fathers to co-parent;
  • potentially increased working time flexibility for certain groups of employees;
  • the extension of certain parental entitlements to parents of older children – eg, consent of the employee raising a child up to the age of eight (currently four) for overtime hours, work during night-time or interrupted working time system, or assignment to work outside the usual place of performance of work.

Whistle-Blowers

The deadline for the implementation of the EU Whistle-Blowing Directive by EU member states lapsed on 17 December 2021 and has not been fulfilled by Poland. The most significant challenges resulting from its implementation (apart from the obligation to protect whistle-blowers under statutory rules) will include the requirement to adopt internal whistle-blowing procedures by entities employing at least 50 persons and, in certain cases, also for certain smaller businesses. In the first wave deadline (not yet finally established though expected to cover the months immediately after the entry into force of the new law) entities that engage at least 250 persons will have to fulfil the respective obligations. The second wave is to include entities that engage between 50 and 250 persons performing work by 17 December 2023. All entities in any case will be obliged to protect whistle-blowers as prescribed. The internal whistle-blowing procedure should be designed to clearly define, in particular, the internal body or person or external entity to which potential whistle-blowers may turn to report and the further procedures for handling such reports. It will be necessary to consult on the draft procedures upfront with trade union(s) or, in their absence, staff representatives elected in the manner adopted at the given entity.

Increased staff representatives’ consultation entitlements

Taking a broader view of the contemplated employment law developments, the trend of frequently assigning additional consultation entitlements to employee/staff representatives in the absence of trade union operations is definitely worth observing. This legislative tendency may potentially influence the impact of trade unions as consultation partners. The obligation in reality constitutes a top-down imposition. The administrative burden of the employee/staff representatives’ election organisation in reality falls on the employer given that in most circumstances, employees (staff) are not capable of arranging the election process on their own.

Linklaters

32nd Floor
Q22, Aleja Jana Pawla II 22
00-133 Warsaw
Poland

+48 22 526 5080

monika.krzyszkowska-dabrowska@linklaters.com www.linklaters.com/en/locations/poland
Author Business Card

Law and Practice

Authors



Hogan Lovells (Warszawa) LLP is one of the top law firms in Poland, offering a broad range of services and tax and legal expertise. The Warsaw office has more than 20 years' experience in advising clients. The employment practice supports clients operating in all sectors of the economy, both in Poland and abroad, and offers them legal advice in all aspects of employment law. The advice covers the following areas: employment aspects of M&A as well as cross-border mergers, including the transfer of employment establishments to new employers, and employee participation rights; restructuring of employment, including group redundancies; issues related to unionised and non-unionised employees; representing employers in negotiations with trade unions, collective disputes and disputes with employees, both inside and outside the courts; cross-border employment and the employment of citizens of EU and non-EU member states in Poland, including work and residency permits; and compliance, mobbing and discrimination-related issues.

Trends and Developments

Authors



Linklaters is a leading global law firm, supporting clients in achieving their strategies wherever they do business. The Warsaw office is one of the largest law firms in Poland, offering a broad range of legal services across all major practice areas. The Warsaw team is part of Linklaters’ global employment practice, which allows it to provide seamless legal support to clients on multinational matters, in particular those requiring an innovative or unified approach across various jurisdictions, and to benefit from the experience gained across the international network. The team works on the most complex and sensitive employee relations issues, including executive exits, whistle-blowing allegations, restructuring and labour disputes and risk management. They also advise on various day-to-day HR matters. The team has vast experience advising various clients from a range of industries on many significant and complex matters in the Polish and European market.

Compare law and practice by selecting locations and topic(s)

{{searchBoxHeader}}

Select Topic(s)

loading ...
{{topic.title}}

Please select at least one chapter and one topic to use the compare functionality.