Provisional Measures No 1,045/2021 and 1,046/2021
In 2021, the Brazilian government enacted Provisional Measures No 1,045/2021 and 1,046/2021, which, respectively, established rules for:
These measures are very similar to those enacted in 2020 and not converted into laws by the National Congress, meaning that their provisions, terms and conditions were only valid during their term (120-days, from March to July and from April to August 2021, respectively).
Law No 14,151/2021
Law No 14,151/2021 determines that, without prejudice to their remuneration, pregnant employees must be prevented from performing face-to-face work activities during the pandemic period and may continue with their employment activities remotely/under a home office regime.
Decree No 10,854
Finally, it is important to point out that Decree No 10,854 of 10 November 2021, revoked more than thirty other Decrees, Ordinances and Normative Instructions, aiming at consolidating, simplifying and reducing bureaucracy in the Brazilian labour law space.
The Decree became enforceable on 10 December 2021 (an exception being made for Articles 174, 177 and 182, which will come into force 18 months after the Decree’s issuing date), consolidating 186 Articles with provisions regarding a wide variety labour matters, including:
There is no distinction between blue-collar and white-collar workers in Brazilian legislation and it would be correct to say that labour courts have a protective bias towards employees, regardless of their seniority/professional experience.
However, with the changes implemented by Law No 13,467/2017, widely known as the “Labour Reform”, employees with a college degree and monthly salary of at least BRL14,174.44 are considered as overqualified or “hypersufficient” and, consequently, may negotiate broader terms and conditions directly with their employer; their employment agreement will prevail over the law and the applicable collective bargaining agreements with respect to certain matters (eg, working hours, bank of hours agreements, bonuses, profit-sharing plans, salary increase, and the possibility of implementing arbitration clauses for conflict resolution).
Employees who occupy fiduciary positions (eg, managers, directors and officers) are also treated as a distinct category under the legislation. To be exempt from working time control and thus not entitled to overtime, such individuals must have effective managerial powers, including the prerogative to hire/dismiss and take disciplinary action against employees, as well as differentiated compensation (at least 40% higher than the compensation payable to those employees not considered as occupying a fiduciary position).
In Brazil, substance/reality will always prevail over form. Therefore, a written agreement is not required to evidence employment, since it can result from verbal arrangements or implied circumstances.
The Brazilian Consolidation of Labour Laws (Consolidação das Leis do Trabalho, or CLT) and other regulations provide a set of minimum employment conditions, leaving to written employment agreements specific matters such as any form of special compensation, fringe benefits, confidentiality, and non-compete covenants.
The admission of an employee requires only the filling out of certain blank spaces in the employee’s Employment Booklet (Carteira de Trabalho, or CTPS, similar to a passport), to identify the employer, the date of admission, salary (generally per month), and the function to be discharged by the employee. Similar annotations should be made on the company’s internal books/registers.
If any of the provisions of the employment agreement is considered illegal, void, or unenforceable by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision is usually deemed to have no force and effect. The illegality or unenforceability of such provision does not impair the enforceability of any other provision of the agreement.
Employment agreements are generally in force for an indefinite term. However, the legislation also foresees very specific situations when the parties can execute an individual employment contract for a defined/fixed term, namely:
Employers have the burden of proof of the circumstances that authorise the execution of the employment agreement for a definite/fixed term. Otherwise, the employment relationship will be governed under indefinite-term employment contract rules, which are generally more favourable to the employee.
The fixed-term employment contract may be renewed once. However, the total length of the relationship on a fixed-term basis may not exceed two years. If more than one renewal is made, the employer would most likely be construed as mischaracterising the form of hiring.
Maximum Working Hours
The Brazilian Federal Constitution establishes that employees are limited to working eight hours per day and 44 hours per week, unless an agreement regarding compensation for worked hours is negotiated or overtime is paid with an increment of at least 50%. If employees perform their duties on their weekly paid resting day and/or holidays, they will be entitled to receive overtime with an increment of 100%, but distinct or higher percentages might be established by the relevant collective bargaining agreement.
The above-mentioned number of hours could be reduced depending on the activities developed by the employee or if their profession is regulated by a specific law (eg, lawyers, doctors, engineers, telemarketing/call centre workers) but it should be noted that overtime cannot be a regularly scheduled event since it should be considered as resulting from “extraordinary” duties or activities.
Night shift hours are reduced (every 52 minutes and 30 seconds of work performed after 10pm and before 5am is considered equal to a full 60 minutes of work) and shall be paid with a night shift premium. In accordance with Brazilian labour law, such premium should be of at least 20% of the employee’s salary (base salary, overtime premium and other salary entitlements). However, collective bargaining agreements might establish higher percentages.
Regulating working hours
Every establishment with more than 20 employees is required to implement mechanical, manual or electronic working hours control. Only employees occupying fiduciary positions or external workers are exempt from registering their working hours, and, thus, are not entitled to overtime and night shift pay or reduced work shifts.
External and Remote Employees
External employees are those who permanently perform their activities externally, in relation to which the employer is unable to effectively control their working hours. Therefore, the mere fact that employees have external activities is not sufficient to classify them as exempt, if the employer may put in place software and/or mechanisms and procedures that register their working hours (eg, timesheets, need to return to the office after external meetings, having determined clock-in or clock-out hours to follow external activities that result in their effective working hours being impossible to control).
Regarding remote workers, among other provisions, Provisional Measure No 1,108 (PM 1,108), issued on 25 March 2022 by the Federal Government, establishes that:
According to the legislation in force, a Provisional Measure must be converted into law within 120 days and, considering that the National Congress has not yet reached a decision (September 2022), it is likely that the provisions, term and conditions established by PM 1,108 will be cancelled/revoked, but it is likely that the labour courts will continue to apply the working time control provisions discussed in the bullet point above.
Bank of Hours Agreements
With the changes introduced by the Labour Reform, employers are allowed to establish/negotiate a bank of hours by means of an individual written agreement entered into between the company and its employees. The overtime compensation for such type of bank of working hours shall occur within six months, otherwise the employer will have to pay the respective hours with the applicable additional percentage.
It is possible to establish that the compensation of hours shall occur within a period of up to 12 months, but in this case the bank of working hours must be negotiated with the labour union. If the overtime hours are not compensated within such negotiated period, the additional payment will also be due.
Part-Time Work
Article 58-A of the CLT establishes the terms, conditions and requirements related to part-time work. This is a special employment status, in which a certain number of hours can be distributed among the working days or during specific days previously established by the employer and employee.
International Labour Organization Convention No 175 qualifies as part-time those employees who work fewer hours per week than full-time employees but do the same work at the same establishment. The salary in this case will be calculated proportionally and this proportion shall not be, in any event, inferior to the base salary of full-time work.
Such employment agreement (i) cannot exceed the limit of 30 working hours per week; and (ii) if the employer and employee set a limit of 26 working hours per week, must allow overtime up to the limit of six hours per week.
After the changes implemented by the Labour Reform, the CLT guarantees the right to take vacation in the same proportion as regular/full-time employees, also permitting the conversion of a third of the vacation period into compensation.
Employees are entitled to compensation, which may include fixed and variable portions. In any event, the employee must receive at least the minimum wage (either determined by law or by the applicable collective bargaining agreement), which is annually adjusted. The current national minimum wage is BRL1,2120, but certain professions (eg, lawyers, doctors, engineers) are regulated by specific laws that might establish distinct minimum pay.
The concept of salary under Brazilian labour law includes not only the fixed amount contracted (“base salary”), but also commissions, rewards, premiums, bonuses or fringe benefits – such as rental and car allowances, and leisure dues – as long as they are granted on a regular basis and are not indispensable for the employee to perform their activities (ie, a “working tool”). If such benefits are contractually provided, their salary nature will also be characterised, regardless of their periodicity.
These amounts should therefore also be taken into consideration when calculating the employee’s statutory labour rights, such as weekly day off, vacation, Christmas bonus, FGTS, and other payments.
Compensation may not be reduced by the employer, although the law permits a temporary reduction if a specific collective bargaining agreement is entered into with the respective labour union. As a general rule, any benefit or condition agreed to by the parties or unilaterally extended by the employer becomes a vested right and cannot be reduced, regardless of any previously agreed term or condition in this regard.
Employees who render the same services (despite their title) for the same employer in the same metropolitan area are entitled to the same salary and working conditions (which include similar variable compensation schemes). Employees may nevertheless end up receiving different compensation packages, in accordance with overtime/night shift hours performed, or targets achieved.
In Brazil, employees are also entitled to an annual Christmas bonus (commonly referred to as a 13th salary), which is equivalent to the employee’s monthly compensation.
Brazilian employers may also provide variable compensation to their employees, in addition to their base salary. Such variable compensation can be based on individual or collective (eg, company) performance/targets/goals, and it generally takes the form of stock option plans, bonuses or commission payments.
When a company creates a variable compensation plan, it has some flexibility and discretion in determining to whom the plan shall be offered (eg, to all employees or only certain individuals), the rules for payment (eg, related to sales or other goals and/or targets) and the periodicity of the payments.
Annual Leave
Brazilian employees are entitled to an annual 30-day paid vacation period, coupled with a bonus equal to a third of the employee’s monthly compensation.
The total vacation pay equals 133.33% of the employee’s monthly salary (including both the contractual amount and an average of other entitlements paid (eg, overtime, night shift premium)). Vacation is only due after 12 months of service (ie, the hiring anniversary), considered a vesting period.
The employer is responsible for choosing the best period in which an employee may take vacation according to the need of the business. In other words, the resting period is granted on a discretionary basis (there are some exceptions; for instance, if the employee is a student or if members of a family work for the same company).
With the employee’s consent, the vacation period may be split in up to three periods, if one of the periods corresponds to a minimum of 14 calendar days and the other two periods to a minimum of five calendar days each. Restrictions for employees younger than 18 and older than 50 are excluded. Vacation may not start in the two-day period prior to holidays or the employee’s weekly day off.
Labour legislation allows employees to convert a third of the vacation period into compensation. The employer is obliged to accept such request by an employee and pay the corresponding amount; that is, an employee is entitled to take the remaining vacation period (20 days) and receive the amount related to the conversion of a third of the vacation period (ten days).
Other Paid Leave
In accordance with the Federal Constitution and Article 473 of the CLT, employees are entitled to paid leave, a summary of which is presented below (longer periods, exceptional leave rules and/or additional benefits can be created by the applicable collective bargaining agreement):
Confidentiality and Non-disparagement Requirements
Brazilian legislation is silent as regards confidentiality and non-disparagement requirements. However, the law recognises an implied obligation not to disclose confidential information or trade secrets to which an employee is privy during the employment relationship. The breaching of this obligation is considered a reason for dismissal with cause, even if not explicit in the employment agreement, as well as a ground for civil (substantial damages) and/or criminal measures to be taken against the professional. This obligation remains in force after the termination of the employment relationship.
There is no legislation in Brazil regulating non-compete covenants in employment contracts or termination agreements. Although their enforceability is still under debate, precedents rendered by labour courts accepting such covenants require that:
It is recommended that non-compete clauses provide a pre-established penalty or amount for duly proven damages, which is to be paid by the employee in the event of non-compliance. Even if such provisions are included in employment agreements, the courts may permit an employee to work for a competitor, simply enforcing the penalty stipulated in the non-compete clause (usually based on the constitutional freedom of work principle).
Non-solicitation clauses are usually not enforceable by Brazilian labour courts, unless the employer is able to prove that the employee used confidential information to solicit other employees or clients/customers (which would be a criminal offence as per the Brazilian Industrial Property Code). Even if the non-soliciting obligations are considered enforceable, it is unlikely that Brazilian labour courts will grant injunctions to suspend or prevent the rendering of services; they may instead impose material damages arising from the former employee’s failure to comply with such obligations.
Such damages are difficult to estimate, as they will likely be based upon proven effective damage to the former employer, which is usually a difficult matter of evidence.
Consequently, an alternative is to reinforce the employee confidentiality obligations, instead of relying on the possible enforceability of post-employment non-soliciting obligations.
The Brazilian General Data Protection Law (Federal Law No 13,709/2018, or LGPD) came into force on 18 September 2020. Largely influenced by the European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and in line with many of its provisions, the LGPD prescribes rules for the processing of personal data of individuals, defining cases in which such data may legitimately be used by third parties and establishing mechanisms to protect data subjects against inappropriate and excessive uses.
The LGPD applies to the processing of personal data carried out by individuals and public or private legal entities, and it aims to protect fundamental rights of freedom and privacy as well as the free development of the personality of natural persons.
Unlike the GDPR, the LGPD does not provide express rules for the processing of personal data in employment relationships. However, the impact of the Law is unquestionable, due to the fact that the processing of employees’ personal data is essential for employers’ activities and development.
Therefore, companies should observe the LGPD provisions at all stages of the employment relationship: from recruitment to health and salary information processing activities, to post-contract data storing. The technical and organisational measures to be adopted by companies for their compliance with said law include, above all, a new governance structure focused on privacy by design, which directly implies that employees are responsible for complying with those corporate rules, including their obligation to act according to the company’s privacy policies, data retention policies and any security measures.
It is important to note that although the LGPD is a recent law, according to the authors’ research, there are already more than 120 labour lawsuits filed by employees based on violation of data subjects’ rights or principles prescribed by the LGPD.
The LGPD’s principles are set out in Article 6 and must be observed for any data processing activity:
Moreover, any activity performed by companies must be justified according to the legal bases provided by Article 7 (personal data) or Article 11 (sensitive data).
Legitimising Data Processing in the Labour Environment
Given the particularities of the labour environment, the legal bases most used to legitimise personal data processing for purposes related to employment relationships are:
The requirements for processing sensitive data are more restrictive and the legal bases for the processing of this special category of data are set out in Article 11, including:
Despite the provisions regarding “consent” as a valid legal basis, employers should only rely on this condition in exceptional situations, since the hierarchical power that permeates employment relationships may jeopardise the freedom to consent.
If agents violate the LGPD causing economic or non-economic damages to others, they will be liable for redressing such damages. It is therefore crucial for companies to internally organise measures and establish obligations as well as responsibilities so that employees comply with the corporate privacy rules, thereby mitigating risks for the company.
In Brazil, foreign workers who perform remunerated services in the local labour market must hold residence permits based on formal applications filed exclusively by Brazilian legal entities before Brazilian immigration authorities.
There are different types of residence permits depending on the reasons behind each expatriation process (eg, employment agreement, transfer of technology, statutory officer), with different requisites under Federal Law No 13,445/2017 (the so-called New Migration Law), Decree No 9,199/2017 and normative resolutions of the National Immigration Council. The relevant visa/residence permit is issued by a Brazilian consulate abroad in favour of a foreign citizen, pursuant to authorisation by the Ministry of Justice.
Normative Resolution No 02/2017 deals with the residence permit for those who plan to work in Brazil with an employment agreement with a Brazilian legal entity. The foreign professional who holds this type of residence permit will only be allowed to work for the Brazilian legal entity that requested/sponsored their work permit. The term of such residence permit is up to two years. Prior to the residence permit’s expiry, it is possible to apply for its extension before the Ministry of Justice, provided that all requirements set forth by the authorities are complied with.
For the purposes of obtaining such a residence permit (based on the employment relationship), the foreign professional must evidence their academic qualification and professional experience compatible with the activity that will be performed in Brazil, by means of diplomas, certificates, or statements of the institutions where they studied and carried out their professional activities. Such documents must be notarised and apostilled to be valid in Brazil.
The Brazilian legal entity, in its turn, must satisfy the following requirements:
Once the foreign professional enters the Brazilian territory bearing the respective residence permit/visa, they must appear at the Federal Police within 30 days for the purpose of having their identification card issued.
The foreign professional shall also be enrolled with the Federal Revenue Service to obtain their Individual Taxpayer Registry (CPF), which allows the professional to open a bank account and fulfil their tax obligations in Brazil.
The issuance of an Employment Booklet (CTPS) is also mandatory. The main conditions of the employment agreement must be duly transcribed in such booklet.
In Brazil, labour unions are regulated by the Federal Constitution and by the CLT. Article 8 of the Federal Constitution grants employees the freedom to organise unions, allowing such entities to commence legal proceedings on behalf of their members individually as well as on behalf of the entire category of workers. The main requirement in this case is that the union must be composed of members who have a solidarity of interests, who perform similar work or are in a similar position.
Labour unions are organised following the core business activities of a company. In principle, all workers of the same economic sector are represented by the same union. For example, all employees of cleaning services companies in the city of São Paulo are represented by the Union of the Workers in Cleaning Services of São Paulo. The same understanding applies to companies, since the association representing a given company shall be that of its core activity.
The following rights were granted by the Federal Constitution.
Brazilian labour unions must comply with a hierarchical system composed of unions, federations (a group of unions) and confederations (a group of federations). The main objective of this hierarchical system is to provide employers and employees with a wider and more efficient protection of interests.
It should be noted that the Brazilian union system is based on obtaining a consensus between social agents and preventing conflicts. Labour unions are therefore focused on:
As mentioned in 6.1 Status/Role of Unions, employees are enrolled with a labour union by force of law. The union represents all workers of a professional category, regardless of whether they want or agree with such representation.
If a professional category does not have a union in a determined city, the workers of such category may create a union by following all legal requirements and procedures, starting with a public notice that an assembly of workers of that category will take place with the intention of creating a labour union (usually organised in the form of a civil partnership). The recognition of such entities is a prerogative of the federal government, which maintains a union register.
The administration of the union will be conducted by a board of directors, composed of not more than seven and no fewer than three members, and of a legal audit committee composed of three members. Such board of directors shall elect the president of the union (from amongst its members).
Elections for the renewal of the board of directors and legal audit committee must take place between 30 and 60 days before the end of the term of those in office.
An employee elected to occupy any administrative or representative position in the union cannot be barred from exercising their functions in the union and may not be transferred to a place or task that may make it difficult or impossible for them to comply with their obligations related to their position at the union.
According to Article 11 of the Federal Constitution, companies with more than 200 employees must elect an employee who will be responsible for direct negotiations with their employer. With the changes implemented by the Labour Reform, the CLT provides that such committee members’ term of office shall be of one year and they cannot be dismissed without cause, from their registration as candidates until the election or one year after the end of their term in office (in the event that they are elected). They may be dismissed under technical, disciplinary, economic or financial grounds, although such will likely be challenged and must be proved by the employer through clear and objective evidence. The number of members of such committee varies depending on the employer’s headcount, as follows:
In Brazil, collective bargaining is used to supplement the terms and conditions set out in an employment agreement entered into between employers and employees. The terms and conditions established by collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) or conventions are applicable to all members of both economic and professional categories that have signed them, regardless of whether they are associates of their relevant labour union.
According to legislation, doctrine and court precedents, collective bargaining is governed by the following principles:
Every year, the employees’ and employers’ labour unions shall enter into a collective negotiation and execute a CBA setting forth provisions applicable to their categories.
CBAs generally set forth the rate for the worker category’s salary adjustment, as well as other labour rights that are more beneficial to the employees than provided in the CLT.
Types of CBAs
There are two types of agreements that can be signed by labour unions: collective agreement and collective convention.
A collective agreement is the normative agreement under which a labour union and a given employer establish labour conditions that must be applied to that company. Huge domestic/multinational companies might use it to establish different/particular rules, which are not applicable to the whole sector.
A collective convention is a normative agreement under which one or more labour unions and employers’ associations/unions establish labour conditions that must be applied to the respective categories. The convention is valid for all companies in the industry or sector represented by the union. Collective conventions are typically viewed as setting the base standard for an industry.
The terms and benefits granted in the CBAs will only apply to employees during the term that the agreement is in force. Such instruments are typically valid for one or two years.
The Effect of CBAs
After the changes implemented by the Labour Reform, benefits and working conditions set forth by specific collective conventions will prevail over legislation and collective agreements whenever related to:
The CLT expressly prevents CBAs from suppressing or reducing benefits or work conditions such as:
An employment agreement may be terminated for cause or without cause by the employer or employee.
Termination without cause need not be justified by the employer. The employer shall give a written notice to the employee and pay the mandatory severances in accordance with Brazilian labour law. The employee may also terminate the employment contract and give a written notice to the employer.
Judicial labour claims in Brazil are very common and are often the result of strained relations/high emotion. The employment termination should be conducted with courtesy, respect and gratitude for all services rendered. Normally, labour claims are filed by former employees when termination is made without respect, courtesy and gratitude.
To prevent litigation, market practice, mainly among multinationals, offers benefits in addition to mandatory severance pay. Termination packages usually involve out-placement and coaching services, extension of a medical plan from two to six months after termination (for employees and family), and a special gratuity payment that varies according to several factors (eg, length of employment, performance, dedication).
Termination for cause may result from a breach by the employee of obligations assumed during the employment relationship (established by law, internal policies and code of conduct, etc) or the bad behaviour of the employee.
The employer may terminate the employment contract with cause as soon as the employer confirms and obtains evidence that the employee has committed misconduct.
In Brazil, labour claims commonly arise with the aim of reversing a dismissal with cause to a dismissal without cause.
The employee may also terminate the employment contract for cause when the employer does not comply with the legislation and the terms and conditions of the employment agreement (eg, lack of payment of salaries, FGTS or benefits; excessive rigor; or physical aggression).
In the case of termination without cause by the employer or employee, a written 30-day notice period is required.
In the case of termination without cause by the employer, the employer may request the employee to work during the notice period and, in this case, the employee may choose to work two fewer hours per day or one week less. The best practice in Brazil is the payment of indemnity in lieu of notice.
When the employee resigns, the employer may require the employee to work during the notice period or discount from the mandatory severance payment the amount corresponding to the unworked notice period. If the employee proves that he/she has received and accepted an offer for a new job, the employer is not allowed to require the employee to work during the notice period but is allowed by law to discount the corresponding one-month salary from the mandatory severance payments.
In the case of termination without cause by the employer, the employee is entitled to the payment of an indemnity for prior notice, corresponding to 30 days of salary plus three days of salary per year worked (limited to 90 days).
The employee will also be entitled to the payment of an accrued 13th salary, vacations and a third of a vacation bonus over the indemnity for prior notice.
The FGTS and its indemnification of 40% will be also calculated over the indemnity for prior notice.
Severance must be paid within ten days after termination under penalty of a fine corresponding to one salary, which reverts to the employee.
The termination of the employment contract must be registered in the Employment Booklet, and the corresponding form for the employee to withdraw the FGTS and obtain unemployment insurance must be delivered to the employee.
The breach by the employee of obligations assumed during the employment relationship or bad behaviour may result in the termination with cause of the employment contract.
The employment contract may be terminated with cause for the following reasons:
In the case of termination with cause, notice is not required. There are no mandatory severance payments. Only salary balance and expired vacation and its bonus of a third is due to the employee. The employee will not be entitled to the indemnification of 40% of the FGTS or a 13th salary.
In Brazil there is no extrajudicial document (eg, an employment termination agreement) that guarantees a full release from an employment contract. A formal agreement may be helpful to prevent litigation, but, in principle, only a settlement in a labour court, ratified by a judge, guarantees a full release.
With the Labour Reform in 2017, there is the possibility of submitting an out-of-court settlement agreement to a labour court for judicial ratification, in order to provide legal certainty to this agreement. To file the request of ratification, the parties must be represented by different attorneys and a hearing is required for the formal approval of the terms of the agreement.
No consensus has been reached regarding the acceptance of full release clauses stipulated in these agreements. However, the Superior Labour Court recently issued a decision recognising the full release for all employment contracts.
With the Labour Reform, the employer and employee may also terminate an employment agreement by mutual consent. In this case, the employee will be entitled to withdraw 80% of the amount of the FGTS deposited and the employer will be allowed to reduce the payment of the indemnification over the indemnification of the FGTS to 20% and decrease the notice period payment by half. However, the employee cannot be forced to execute the mutual agreement.
Some employees may acquire the right to stability at work and may only be terminated with cause. The main types of stability at work result from the following events:
With the Labour Reform, employers with more than 200 employees must allow employees to elect representatives, who will be entitled to stability at work for the term of their mandates (12 months) and for the next 12 months.
For these categories of employees, termination of the employment contract is only possible with cause. In this case, a proceeding may be filed by the employer before the labour courts for recognition of the misconduct of the employee and valid dismissal with cause.
If the employee resigns, the termination of the employment contract will be possible through the assistance of the employees’ union representative at the Ministry of Labour or at the labour courts. The employee who has stability at work cannot waive the labour guarantee. The termination will be valid only if in compliance with the labour laws.
An individual who believes/understands that the termination of the employment contract resulted from a discriminatory act caused by the employer may file a labour claim before the labour courts to challenge the dismissal and require reinstatement to work; reinstatement of medical insurance, if applicable; as well as the payment of indemnities (moral and material damages).
In such labour claim, the employee must prove that the employer acted with a specific illegal motivation. The labour court may, in some cases, issue an injunction before the final decision, determining that the employer reinstate the employee to work and reinstate the medical insurance under a fixed penalty – normally per day – if the employer does not comply with the terms and conditions imposed by the decision.
According to Brazilian legislation, denying or preventing someone’s employment because of race is a crime. Additionally, the Brazilian Federal Constitution forbids racial discrimination and discrimination based on gender, race or age.
Sexual harassment is also a crime and may be considered a violation of the employment contract by the employer, thereby giving employees legal cause to terminate the employment contract with cause.
The Labour Public Prosecutor’s Office, the Ministry of Labour and the unions are authorised to file labour proceedings and judicial claims regarding discrimination, specifically claiming the payment of damages for pain and suffering sought by employees in cases of discrimination.
The Public Prosecutor’s Office can start an investigation following an anonymous tip and may require the employer to file documents and clarifications, as well as notify employees to file their statements.
As a result of the investigation, the Public Prosecutor’s Office may enter into an agreement with the employer in which the employer undertakes to:
The amount of “collective moral damages” may vary according to the number of employees damaged and the equity capital of the employer.
If the employer does not accept the proposal by the Public Prosecutor’s Office to settle, the Public Prosecutor’s Office may file a class action before the labour courts to compel the employer to provide the applicable measures in accordance with legislation to avoid/mitigate the practice of any kind of discrimination at the workplace, and to pay the collective moral damages (in the latter event, in higher amounts than those proposed during the above-mentioned potential settlement).
The Ministry of Labour can also initiate an investigation. In this case, an infraction notice can be issued by the Ministry of Labour against the employer, which may result, after due process, in a penalty.
The individual may also file a labour lawsuit against the employer before the labour courts. The individual has the burden of proof in any allegation of discrimination caused by the employer or its representative.
The unions may also file collective claims alleging the existence of misconduct by the employer regarding discriminatory acts against employees.
If such discriminatory conduct is proved, the employer will probably be required to:
The employer may also try to settle with the plaintiff and commit to adopting internal measures to avoid/mitigate any kind of discrimination against employees.
Employees may file labour claims until the second anniversary of the termination of their employment contracts (dismissal date), to claim labour rights related to the five-year period immediately preceding the filing date of the claim.
There are Arbitration Chambers for cases in which employment contracts establish an arbitration clause.
The employees’ union may also file class actions against the employer before the labour court to request compliance with labour legislation in favour of a group of employees.
Since the Labour Reform, employment contracts may establish an arbitration clause if requested by the employee or with the express agreement of the employee. Normally, the clause is established with C-level employees, considering that the law allows the arbitration clause when the employee is considered “hypersufficient”.
Prior to the Labour Reform, some employment terminations were submitted to arbitration, but the Superior Labour Court did not recognise the validity of settlements entered into between the employee and employer before the Arbitration Chamber.
Since the Labour Reform, a plaintiff may also be obliged to pay attorney’s fees in favour of the defendant if the requests made by the plaintiff are all denied or partially granted.
The attorney’s fees may vary from the minimum of 5% to the maximum of 15%. The amount will be calculated considering the result of the economic benefit or the updated amount of the labour claim.
If the plaintiff is a beneficiary of free justice and proves that they cannot afford such payment, the labour courts may dismiss such payment or suspend the execution for a period of two years after the final decision, finally extinguishing the execution of the attorney’s fees.
Av. Cidade Jardim, 803 5th floor
Edifício Cidade Jardim
Itaim Bibi – CEP 01453-000
São Paulo SP
Brazil
+55 11 3141 9100
info@felsberg.com.br www.felsberg.com.br/enCOVID-19 and the Transition to New Forms of Remote Working
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the world witnessed a complete change in social dynamics, marked by restrictions on free movement and justified by the efforts of government and non-government organisations to suppress the spread of the coronavirus. The implemented restrictions involved measures from complete lockdown to strict health and safety protocols for public/shared places.
Labour relationships were severely impacted and employers across the word were compelled to establish new employment dynamics that required the performance of labour activities outside of the office, which was made possible through the use of technology. The sudden imposition of public health restrictions forced employers to rapidly implement remote working procedure that, up till then, had been introduced slowly and carefully.
Two years after the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is possible to verify that even though the adaptation process had been challenging for many companies and workers, remote work has also proven itself to be useful and beneficial to both. Consequently, even though public health restrictions have been almost completely lifted, new forms of remote work are being implemented and tested by companies around the globe according to the new social dynamics imposed by the pandemic.
Thus, the expression “anywhere office” has been commonly used to refer to the work regime in which employees may work from their homes, offices or any other space. This expression is bound to become part of many companies’ permanent internal policies as it establishes more flexible workdays, decreases commuting hours, reduces general workplace expenses (the savings on central business district office space alone are often considerable), and provides flexibility for employees to perform the same work from a location of their choosing. This new mode of working, however, remains only partially regulated by Brazilian legislation, leaving legal professionals looking to the laws implemented by other countries for some guidance.
Under the new social dynamics, remote work regimes have proved to be a way of attracting and retaining talent due to the fact that it enables employees to work from locations far from their physical workplaces, which may include other cities and even different countries.
The Anywhere Office: Remote Work Regulation under Brazilian Labour Law
Remote work may be classified as work predominantly performed out of the company’s premises through the use of technology. Essentially, it tends to provide for a more flexible workday for employees and a decrease in direct employer supervision regarding the labour activities that may be executed at several locations, which include the employee’s home or co-working spaces.
It differs from in-office activities due to the non-existence of direct personal control and regular face-to-face interaction, which generally allows for the adoption of more flexible working hours.
From a legal perspective, Brazilian labour law provides for parameters that combine the flexibility that this working system provides as well the protection of employees’ labour rights that companies are required to comply with in order to adopt an “anywhere office” system.
The Brazilian Labour Reform and the regulation of remote work
Despite the fact that remote work has increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, the regulation of remote work under Brazilian labour law dates from significantly before the pandemic. Law No 13,467 of 2017, commonly known as the Brazilian Labour Reform, introduced the legal parameters for remote work employment agreements into the Brazilian Labour Code.
As per the provisions of Article 75-B of the Brazilian Labour Code, remote work is considered to be the execution of services predominantly outside of the employer’s premises, via the use of information and communication technologies. The sole paragraph of the aforementioned Article establishes that employee attendance at an employer’s premises for the execution of specific activities does not render the remote work regime characterisation false.
Due to the remote performance of the work, the Brazilian Labour Reform included Item III of Article 62 of the Brazilian Labour Code, to provide that employees working under remote work regimes are exempted from the work schedule regulations set forth in the Chapter II of the Brazilian Labour Code. This means that these employees were generally not subject to time tracking, did not have a fixed daily shift, did not have their rests and breaks tracked and were not entitled to overtime payment.
Regarding this provision, there were two different positions adopted by the labour courts:
In order for a remote work employment agreement to be valid, this labour regime must be stipulated by a written employment agreement that provides for the relevant regime and species the activities that the employee shall execute.
The agreement must contain provisions regarding which party will have responsibility for the acquisition, maintenance and supply of the technological tools and infrastructure required and appropriate for the execution of remote work as well as regarding the reimbursement of expenses eventually incurred by the employee. Despite the fact that there is no explicit obligation for the employer to be responsible for such expenses, there are other provisions included prior to the Brazilian Labour Reform that state that the employer must bear the risks of the activity (ie, bear expenses) and has the duty to provide a healthy workplace (ie, grant adequate and ergonomic tools).
Regarding health and safety matters related to remote work, the Brazilian Labour Code stipulates that it is up to the employer to instruct employees regarding the precautions to be taken during execution of work in order to avoid work accidents and work-related injuries. It is also necessary that the employee sign a term of responsibility committing to follow the instructions provided by the employer.
Arising from an employer’s duty to ensure a healthy workplace, it is the employer’s duty to inspect and ensure full compliance with ergonomics and health and safety measures accordingly to the Ordinances issued by Ministry of Labour at the company’s premises. When it comes to the execution of such duty in a remote work regime, however, the matter is not simply resolved. An individual’s home is treated as inviolable by the Federal Constitution and therefore an employer, even if it wanted to, could not verify whether the employee is in compliance with labour regulations nor prevent potential work-related injuries.
This matter is not yet regulated by Brazilian labour laws but in Portugal, for instance, Article 170 item II of the Labour Code expressly provides the possibility to inspect the employee’s residence, determining, however, that it “must only have as its purpose the control of the work activity, as well as the work tools and can only be carried out between 9am and 7pm, with the assistance of the employee or a person designated by them”.
The remote work regime may also be modified to a regular on-site regime provided that the modification is agreed by mutual consent of employer and employee and registered via an amendment to the employment agreement. The employer may also require the modification of the work regime, but a transitional period of 15 days upon notification and an amendment to the employment agreement are required.
Law No 14,442 of 2022: new perspectives on remote work regulation
On 2 September 2022, the Provisory Act No 1,108 of 2022 was converted into Law No 14,442. Among other provisions, it established new rules on remote work modifying articles of the Brazilian Labour Code. As of the issuance of the Provisory Act, which was subsequently converted into ordinary law, employees in remote work regime can attend the employer’s premises to perform specific tasks, even if on a regular basis, without the voiding of the remote work regime, which was previously defined as work performed predominantly outside of an employer’s premises. Thus, the new rule provides for legal parameters related to a “hybrid work system”.
The new law also stipulates new rules on employees’ workdays and regarding the control of working hours in the context of remote work regimes. Under this regulation, only employees hired under a remote work regime to provide services on demand are exempt from the rules related to the duration of work and workdays of Chapter II of the Brazilian Labour Code. In light of the fact that these employees are hired to perform specific activities and tasks, it is understood that they are able to manage their workdays according to their routine and duties.
The exemption for the control of working hours, however, is still applicable for remote work employees who are hired via a regular workday regime. In this case, the employer must proceed with the control of the employees’ workday remotely, which means that these employees are entitled to the regular rules related to the workday (ie, payment for overtime work and rest breaks).
Law No 14,442 of 2022, also provides that the time spent by the employee using the technological and digital equipment, infrastructure and work tools destined to enable the rendering of services under the remote work regime that are not included in the employee’s work shift will not be considered working hours nor on-call regime, unless there is a provision providing for such in an individual or collective bargaining agreement. This provision imposes the assumption that no overtime would be due if the employee continues to use the corporate notebook after the end of their shift, for example. However, the labour courts could grant overtime requests in this scenario if the employee is able to produce evidence that they were actually rending services for the employer after the end of the shift.
It also authorises employees in remote work regime to carry out their activities in a location other than the previously agreed place of work, including abroad. Also, the adoption of remote work regime for interns and apprentices has become a legally foreseen possibility.
Finally, it establishes that employers must prioritise the allocation of remote work regime for employees with disabilities and those who have children of up to four years of age.
Internal policies for work from home regimes in Brazil
In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing rules required employers to adapt their workforce dynamics to a scenario in which services were provided remotely. Thus, temporary or permanent work from home policies were adopted by companies from different industries in Brazil.
Home office
The “home office” regime is a labour regime in which the employee temporarily executes labour activities from home in a context in which the employment agreement also provides for a regular on-site workdays.
Internal rules regarding the home office regime may be stipulated and regulated by companies through internal policies along with amendments to individual employment agreements. The rules regarding the home office system may provide for the period in which the system is to be adopted, the company positions that are eligible for the temporary remote provision of services, the use of company equipment at home, the reimbursement of expenses incurred by the employee and the payment of transport vouchers during the relevant period, among other provisions.
Although the home office system differs from the remote regime regulated by the Brazilian Labour Code, it is possible to use the provisions provided therein as parameters for the execution of the system, especially regarding employer instructions on health and safety at work.
The transition to the home office system must also observe reasonable term.
Hybrid work
The hybrid work system is a regime of work in which services are executed by the employee predominantly at the employer’s premises but with flexibility for remote work provisions. In can be stipulated in the context of a regular employment agreement or in the context of remote work employment agreement, considering that the attendance of remote work employees at the employer’s premises, even on a regular basis, does not result in the voiding of the remote work regime.
Internal policies and individual agreements may provide for rules referring to the specific days of the week in which the employees can execute labour activities outside of an employer’s premises as well as the positions that are compatible with the regime. Other provisions mentioned in the Home office section above may also be stipulated.
Transnational Remote Work
In a scenario in which economic activities are increasingly globalised, more and more Brazilian and multinational companies seek to hire employees who are based in different countries to provide services under a transnational remote work regime, which refers to the execution of labour in a country other than the one in which the employing company is based with the support of information and communication technology.
In this scenario, it is always important to verify the applicable labour law in accordance with the circumstances of the case.
Brazilian-based companies hiring employees to execute work from abroad
Brazilian-based companies are allowed to hire Brazilian and foreign national employees to provide remote work from different jurisdictions. In this case, the territoriality principle must be applied to the employment relationship – which means that a worker is entitled to the labour rights regarding social protection and work accidents applicable to the country where they execute their labour activities – as provided by the Convention on Private International Law, also known as the Bustamante Code, that was ratified by Brazil in 1929.
From a Brazilian labour standpoint, however, the location where the employee is hired is also important for the definition of the applicable labour law. This is because Law No 7,064, of 1982, stipulates that employees hired in Brazil and then transferred to work in a different country are entitled to Brazilian labour law if they provide for better conditions than those of the country to which they have been transferred, as well as the specific rules provided by Law No 7,064, of 1982. Also, employees hired by a Brazilian-based company to provide services from abroad are also deemed as transferred employee for the purposes of Law No 7,064, of 1982, except in case of transitory services for periods of less than 90 days.
It is important to note that provisions related to transferred employees are applicable regardless the nationality of the transferred employees because the relevant factor to be considered is the place where they were hired by the Brazilian company.
Digital nomads in Brazil: migratory regulations of foreign nationals executing remote work in Brazil for foreign companies
Brazilian migratory authorities have recently taken a step forward on the regulation of international employment activities in Brazilian territory. In September 2021, the National Immigration Council, an agency of the Ministry of Justice, issued Normative Resolution (NR) No 45, which provides for the issuance of a temporary visa and residence permit for foreign digital nomads – expats who execute remote labour activities with the use of technology for foreign companies.
NR No 45 provides that the digital nomads that hold this kind of visa are allowed to stay in Brazil for an initial period of one year, a period which may be extended for an additional 12 months.
The status of digital nomad is proved upon presentation of (i) a term signed by the applicant declaring that they are capable of executing remote labour activities with the appropriate technology; (ii) an employment or services agreement that provides proof of the legal bond entered into with the foreign company; and (iii) proof of subsistence means paid by foreign entity in a monthly amount equal or superior to USD1,500 or bank funds in the minimum amount of USD18,000.
The request for the relevant visa shall follow the procedures and requirements provided by NR No 45. Foreign nationals may also apply for the relevant visa while they are in Brazilian territory if they meet the requirement provided by the relevant resolution.
NR No 45 also stipulates that foreign visitors are allowed to carry out labour activities as digital nomads while they are in Brazil in accordance with their nationalities and rules related to the periods of stay and to the expedition of the visitor visa.
Final Comments
Technological progress and globalisation have both contributed to a continuous change in labour dynamics due to the interconnectivity of modern society, allowing for remote work regimes to be progressively adopted by employees worldwide.
In Brazil, it is possible to verify that an increase in the adoption of work systems that include the execution of services from outside of employer premises through the use of technology are accompanied by advances in the regulation of these work systems. In this scenario, it is of utmost importance that employers and companies seek the appropriate legal support prior to adopting remote work systems in order to assess the best market practices and comply with Brazilian labour regulations.
Av. Pres. Juscelino Kubitschek, 1455
6° floor - Vila Nova Conceição
04543-011
São Paulo - SP
Brazil
+55 11 2504 4210
tauilchequer@mayerbrown.com www.tauilchequer.com.br