The principal laws and regulations governing the banking sector are the following:
The regulator responsible for supervising banks in Senegal is the Banque Centrale des Etats d’Afrique de l’Ouest (the Main Agency of the Central Bank of West African States) (hereinafter referred to as the Central Bank or the BCEAO).
In Senegal, the banking authorisation regime is regulated by the Law 2008-26 of 28 July 2008 on banking regulation (Law of 2008).
According to this law, credit institutions can apply for a bank licence or a financial institution licence, which differ slightly in the activities they allow institutions to carry out. Financial institutions are categorised in five different categories, namely:
In general, banks may carry out the classic banking operations, namely the receipt of funds from the public, credit operations, the provision to customers and the management of payment methods. Regarding the financial institutions, they are allowed to carry out only the activities for which they are classified and cannot carry out the activities from another category without a preliminary approval (Article 17, Law of 2008).
In addition, credit institutions are authorised to carry out the following activities and services:
Regarding the approval process, applications for authorisation are submitted to the Minister of Finance and the Central Bank, which examines them with regard to the conditions and obligations provided for by the Law of 2008 (Article 15). The Central Bank examines in particular the firm’s programme of activities, the financial and technical resources, the plan of development of the network of branches, agencies and counters, as well as the firm’s capacity to realise its development goals. The Central Bank also receives all the information on the status of the persons who have provided the capital, as well as on the fitness and experience of the persons responsible for managing and directing the firm.
The approval is issued by order of the Minister of Finance, after approval by the Banking Commission of the Union Monétaire et Economique Ouest Africain (UEMOA). If, after a period of six months from the application to the Central Bank, it has not taken position on the request, the approval is deemed to have been refused (Article 16, Law of 2008). The approval is registered on the list of banks and financial institutions, which is established and updated by the Banking Commission and published on the Journal Officiel de la République du Sénégal.
During the life of the bank, operations that have a significant impact on the shareholder structure are governed by Articles 39 to 41 of the Law of 2008.
To this end, merger operations by absorption or creation of a new company or demerger are subject to prior authorisation by the Minister of Finance, after approval by the Banking Commission of the BCEAO. Moreover, under the same article, any acquisition or transfer of a holding that would have the effect of raising the holding of any one person (directly or through an intermediary) or of any group of persons acting in concert, first above the blocking minority, then above the majority of voting rights in the credit institution, is subject to the same obligation of prior authorisation by the Minister of Finance; also, any acquisition or transfer of a holding that would have the effect of lowering the holding below those thresholds is subject to the same requirement.
In addition, banks and financial institutions with their registered office abroad are required to notify the Banking Commission of any operation referred to above that concerns them.
Pursuant to Article 2 of Instruction No 19-12-2011 of December 27, 2011 establishing the list of Documents and Information Constituting the Prior Authorization File for the Modification of the Shareholding Structure of Credit Institutions (“the Instruction”), the prior authorisation file must be submitted in four copies to Central Bank of the member state in which the credit institution is located, following the format provided for in Annex 2 of the Instruction, and it must include a written request addressed to the Minister of Finance of the Republic of Senegal, as well as the documents and information listed in Annex 1 of the Instruction.
The application for prior authorisation, which is processed in the same way as for authorisation, is addressed to the Minister of Finance and filed with the National Directorate of the BCEAO. Authorisation from the Minister of Finance, after receiving the assent of the Banking Commission, is required before the planned operation is carried out.
Under Senegalese legislation, corporate governance requirements are also regulated by the Law of 2008.
The following conditions apply to banks.
As for the financial institutions, the following conditions apply.
Under Senegalese law, credit institutions are required to establish a corporate governance mechanism in line with good practice and adapted to their size, structure, and the nature and complexity of their activities (Article 4 of the Circular N°01-2017/CB/C of 27 September 2017 relating to the Governance of Credit Institutions and Financial Companies in the WAEMU (hereinafter the Circular of 2017 on Corporate Governance).
The Registration and oversight of Directors and Senior Management is generally regulated by the Law of 2008 and more specifically by the Circular no 02-2017/CB/C of 27 September 2017 on the Conditions of Exercise of the Functions of Directors and Officers in Credit Institutions and Financial Companies of the WAEMU.
The provisions of the Law of 2008 regulate the status of directors and require the directors to be of Senegalese nationality or of the nationality of one of the member states of the WAEMU.
However, the Minister of Finance may, on advice of the Banking Commission, grant individual exemptions on the nationality requirement. In such case, the directors must hold at least one master’s degree or an equivalent diploma and must have at least five years of professional experience in the banking sector, finance sector or any other field relevant to the functions envisaged (Article 24, Law of 2008).
In order to obtain an individual exemption on the nationality requirement, the credit institution must have sent to the Minister of Finance an approval specifying:
The request sent to the National Directorate of the BCEAO must contain the following documents:
Persons involved in the direction, administration, management, control or operation of the establishments of the credit institutions are bound by the professional banking secrecy (Article 30).
Under Senegalese law, employees of the banks are bound by the provisions of Senegalese Labour Code, by the provisions of the Interprofessional Nation Collective Agreement, as well as by the specific provisions of the Collective Agreement on Banks and Financial Institutions in Senegal.
In fact, under Senegalese Labour Law, employees are classified into different categories, which correspond to different remuneration scales. The Collective Agreement on Banks and Financial Institutions provides for specific classification of bank employees according to the job they hold. As such, bank employees are classified into:
Depending on the category in which the bank and financial institution employee is classified, a specific remuneration is provided for by the Ministry of Labour, who sets up the categorical salary scales in the private sector. The basic salaries provided for by the Ministry for the different categories are mandatory and cannot be reduced by the employer.
The legislation in force in Senegal against money laundering is composed of national laws and community and international standards. In this regard, it should be noted that the reference national law in this regard is Law No 2018/03 of 23 February 2018 on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing, which transposes into domestic law the Uniform Anti-Money Laundering Bill adopted by Decision No 26/CM/WAEMU of 2 July 2015 (the AML/CFT Law).
Persons subject to AML/CFT obligations are listed in Articles 5 and 6 of the AML/CFT Law, including financial institutions.
The AML/CFT Law introduced the risk-based approach, requiring financial institutions to have policies of procedures and internal controls to effectively mitigate and manage AML/CFT risks. Articles 23 and 24 of the AML/CFT Law impose several obligations, including:
In addition to the obligations listed above, banks have an obligation of vigilance with respect to their customers. Indeed, the law obliges banks to have an updated knowledge of all their customers, including their income and assets, and to monitor their operations. In this respect, Article 18 of the AML/CFT Law provides the following: “Before entering into a business relationship with a customer or assisting them in the preparation or execution of a transaction, the persons mentioned in Articles 5 and 6 of this Law shall identify the customer and, where applicable, the beneficial owner of the business relationship by appropriate means and shall verify these identification elements on presentation of any reliable written document. (...)”. Article 19 of the AML/CFT Law provides the following: “Before entering into a business relationship with a customer, the persons referred to in Articles 5 and 6 of this Law shall collect and analyse the items of information, from among those included in the list drawn up for this purpose by the supervisory authority, that are necessary for the knowledge of their customer as well as the purpose and nature of the business relationship, in order to assess the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing”.
In addition, financial institutions, when entering into a business relationship or conducting transactions with or on behalf of foreign politically exposed persons (PEPs), are required to take specific measures to:
(i) implement adequate and appropriate risk-based procedures to determine whether the customer or a beneficial owner of the customer is a PEP;
(ii) obtain authorisation from the appropriate level of management before entering into a business relationship with such customers;
(iii) take any appropriate risk-based measures to establish the origin of the assets and the source of the funds involved in the business relationship or transaction; and
(iv) ensure enhanced ongoing monitoring of the business relationship.
In the case of PEPs, national or international organisations, financial institutions are required to implement adequate and appropriate risk-based procedures to determine whether the customer or a beneficial owner of the customer is a PEP and to apply, in the case of higher risk business relationships with such persons, the measures referred to in (ii), (iii) and (iv) above.
Finally, financial institutions are required to identify and assess the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing, which may result from:
Failure to comply with these procedures exposes the institution to the administrative, disciplinary and criminal sanctions provided for in Articles 112 (and subsequent articles) of the AML/CFT Law.
The depositor’s protection regime is governed by the Decision n°088-03-2014 of 21 March 2014 on the creation of the Depositors’ Guarantee Fund in the West African Monetary Union; by the Articles of Association of the Depositors’ Fund Guarantee in the WAEMU and the Decision n°009 of 30/06/2017/CM/WAEMU setting the rates of contribution of members to the Depositors’ Guarantee Fund in the WAEMU and the compensation limit for eligible deposit holders.
All licensed credit institutions have the obligation to adhere to a depositor protection regime, namely the Depositor’ Guarantee Fund (the Fund) (Article 65, Law of 2008).
The Fund’s purpose is to protect small depositors against the loss of their savings in the event of suspension of payments by a credit institution or a Decentralised Financial Systems (SFDs). The Fund’s mission is to guarantee the deposits of clients of the credit institutions and SFDs licensed in the WAEMU. As such, the Fund is, among other things, responsible for indemnifying the depositors, to the limit of an amount set by the Council of Ministers of the WAEMU, due to the unavailability of their funds.
The Fund is administered by the Board of Directors and the Management.
The limits for compensation to the depositors are set by the Council of Ministers on the proposal of the Board of Directors. Hence, the limits for compensation are as follows:
The scheme is funded by members’ (namely all the credit institutions and SFDs affiliated to the Fund of the WAEMU) contributions, investment income and, where applicable, donations, grants and loans, as well as any other resources compatible with the purpose of the Fund (Article 27 of the Articles of Association).
In the event that the Fund’s resources are insufficient, additional contributions are sought from member institutions, under the conditions defined by the circular of the Fund (Article 28 of the Articles of Association).
Senegal is no exception to other countries with respect to bank secrecy, to which licensed credit institutions in Senegal are bound. Hence, bank secrecy requirements are regulated in Senegal and the provisions are mainly provided for in the Law of 2008.
As such, the persons in charge of the management, administration, control or operation of credit institutions are bound by the bank secrecy. Such persons are more precisely prohibited from disclosing any confidential information of which they have knowledge in the course of their activity, to conduct directly or indirectly operations for their own account or to benefit others (Article 30, Law of 2008).
That being said, the bank secrecy is not enforceable against the Banking Commission, the Central Bank and the judicial authority acting in the context of criminal proceedings (Article 53, Law of 2008).
A breach of the bank secrecy, for banks, is sanctioned by the above-mentioned provisions by a fine of XOF51-150 million and for financial institutions, by a fine of XOF16-60 million.
A breach of the confidential information of which the above-mentioned persons have knowledge in the course of their activity is sanctioned by imprisonment of one month to two years and/or a fine of XOD10-100 million. In the event of a repeated offence, the maximum penalty will be increased to five years’ imprisonment and a fine of XOF300 million.
The prudential system completes the Banking Law. It is adopted by the WAEMU Council of Ministers on the proposal of the BCEAO, pursuant to Article 44 of the Banking Law.
In Senegal, in addition to the Banking Law, Decision n°013-24-06 CM WAEMU relating to the prudential framework applicable to credit institutions (“the Decision”) is intended to establish a prudential framework in force within WAEMU and in particular in Senegal.
The preamble to the Decision states that the WAEMU community framework, and in particular the minimum capital requirements according to risks (credit, operational, market), is based on the Basel II and Basel III rules, and the Basel rules have been transposed taking into account the characteristics of the economies and specificities of the WAEMU banking system.
It consists of a series of provisions organised around three themes:
Among the requirements of the prudential system is the integration of operational risk into the process of supervising credit institutions. In this respect, the Commission Bancaire proposes two approaches to the evaluation of operational risks based on weightings applied to the institution's Net Banking Income (NBI). These weights are identical to those defined by the Basel Committee, namely 15% for the basic approach and a level varying between 12% and 18% for the standard approach.
Among other things, it requires institutions wishing to use the standard approach to set up an operational risk management function with strong involvement of the executive body, which defines the roles and responsibilities of each player.
In the area of credit risk, the precise assessment of risk under the standard approach is based primarily on the counterparty weightings set by the French Banking Commission. These weights depend on the ratings established by External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs) or Rating Agencies. In addition, the Annex to the Decision also provides for the reinforcement of the core capital to be mobilised by the banks under Pillar 1 requirements (minimum capital requirements). Indeed, banks must hold a level of core capital corresponding to a minimum threshold of 5% of the amount of their exposure to credit, market and operational risks. This ratio is reinforced by the introduction of a conservation buffer established at a maximum level of 2.5% of the bank's total exposure to risk, following the example of the threshold defined by Basel III.
Ultimately, banks in the WAEMU zone had to mobilise a minimum capital level of 8.625% of their risk-weighted assets at the end of 2018, of which 5% was dedicated to core capital (CET1) and 0.625% to conservation buffer.
Regarding the thresholds of banks' share capital, Decision No 003 of 30/03/2015/CM/WAEMU fixing the minimum share capital of credit institutions of the member states of the WAEMU has set the minimum share capital of credit institutions of the member states of the WAEMU at XOF10 billion for banks and XOF3 billion for financial institutions of a banking nature.
Article 36 of the Banking Law stipulates that banks and financial institutions must at all times have equity capital at least equal to the minimum capital determined under Article 34.
The legal and regulatory framework governing the insolvency, recovery and resolution of banks is in general governed by the OHADA Uniform Act on the Organization of Collective Procedures (the Uniform Act) and more specifically by the Law of 2008.
The Uniform Act specifically organises three procedures for dealing with companies in difficulty: preventive settlement, judicial recovery and liquidation of assets.
Preventive settlement is a procedure intended to avoid the insolvency or closure of business and to enable the discharge of the company’s liabilities by means of a preventive composition agreement. This procedure is applicable to any person who, whatever the nature of their debts, is in a difficult but not in an irremediably compromised economic and financial situation and thus allows the company to be exempted from the payment of most of its debts in order to prepare a recovery plan for the company.
The procedures of judicial recovery and liquidation of assets presuppose the cessation of payments of the company. There is a cessation of payments when “the debtor is unable to meet its current liabilities with its available assets”. The judicial recovery is a procedure designed to safeguard the company and for it to pay off its liabilities. In order to implement this procedure, the company must be likely to be saved. The liquidation of assets is a procedure whose purpose is to realise the debtor's assets in order to pay off their liabilities. The purpose of the liquidation of assets is to ensure the best possible payment of the creditors of creditors of the company that is to disappear.
The procedures of preventive settlement, judicial recovery and liquidation of assets instituted by the Uniform Act can only be opened against a credit institution after the assent of the Commission Bancaire (Article 88, Law of 2008).
Regarding the procedure of liquidation of assets, in the event of the opening or pronouncement of liquidation proceedings against a credit institution, the Commission Bancaire shall take a decision on the withdrawal of authorisation and the winding up of the institution.
As for the FSB Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes, there is no evidence of implementation by the Senegalese government of these attributes.
Under Senegalese law, all creditors, regardless of their particular situation (employees, preferential creditors, unsecured creditors, etc), are concerned by the above-mentioned procedures. In this respect, creditors cannot pursue the recovery of their claim against a defaulting debtor by starting an individual procedure. Collective procedures may be imposed on the creditors of a company in difficulty.
In the event of the liquidation of a credit institution, the bank account holders shall be reimbursed immediately after the creditors of legal costs and creditors of super-privileged wages, up to an amount determined by the competent judicial authority on the basis of the available resources (Article 97, Law of 2008). This does not apply to deposits of credit and other financial institutions.
No content has been provided
In Senegal, there are no specific banking regulatory requirements related to ESG matters. Although no specific banking regulatory requirements are provided for under Senegalese legislation, credit institutions are encouraged to implement or strengthen their environmental, social and governance responsibility by implementing the international ESG standards. These ESG standards encourage, among other things, the quality of social dialogue, employment of disabled people, transparency of executive remuneration, the fight against corruption, etc.
Banks and financial institutions may, on a voluntary basis, implement and adapt ESG requirements to their specific structure and activities.
66, boulevard de la République
Immeuble Seydou Nourou Tall,
1er étage
BP. 11417 Dakar
Senegal
+ 221 338214722
+ 221 33 821 45 43
houda@avocatshouda.com www.avocatshouda.comFintech and Investment Opportunities in Senegal: Overview and Practice
Overview of payment fintechs in Senegal
Senegal, with an estimated population of 16.74 million, is growing towards financial inclusion. Due to the dynamism of the ecosystem, the country has about 20 fintech companies, 47 facilitators, and financing partners spread over several areas of activity: payments, credit, banking infrastructure, markets, investment and savings, insurance, etc.
In order to boost the fintech sector, the government passed a Law n°2020-01 of 6 January 2020 on the creation and promotion of start-ups in Senegal to stimulate financial inclusion. Fintech companies initially focused on payment solutions for micro-, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), before moving into the development of digital credit solutions in partnership with financial institutions or other fintech companies.
International investors could help address current challenges to develop the capacity of fintech companies that could play a key role in financial inclusion through digital financial services in Senegal.
Throughout the African continent, fintech is the sector that has captured the most investments with 63% of the funds injected into African start-ups in 2021. For example, in Senegal, Wave raised a record USD200 million in September 2021.
Lack of a uniform regulatory framework
Fintech activity in Senegal is currently not regulated. However, while waiting for the implementation of a specific regulation in this area, the Central Bank has set up a Bureau de Connaissance et de Suivi des FinTech (BCSF).
The mission of the BCSF is to promote the fintech sector by organising exchanges between the regulator and the stakeholders; these exchanges have become essential in the digital transformation and promotion of financial inclusion.
The census conducted in the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) at the end of 2021 has enabled the Banque Centrale des Etats d’Afrique de l’Ouest (the “Central Bank” or the BCEAO) to note that fintech companies are mainly involved in the provision of payment means and services, such as the distribution of electronic money, money transfer and payment aggregation. They also offer digital platforms for e-commerce, data management and financial flows.
In order to support the development of fintech in the WAEMU, the BCSF is responsible for collecting and processing requests for information or interviews with the regulator, as well as any subject of common interest in relation to technological innovations and the regulation of the financial sector.
No need for authorisation or approval to practise
Due to the lack of legislation governing this activity, the flourishing fintech industry in Senegal does not require prior authorisation or approval from any authority. However, the activity of fintech companies remains subject to a set of rules, including those on electronic money, consumer protection, banking law, the code of civil and commercial obligations, API security and electronic transactions, and personal data.
Innovative fintech offers must comply with the legal, financial and fiscal regulations in force in Senegal. Fintech companies need to establish partnerships to develop their offerings. These partnerships are concluded with electronic money institutions in order to use electronic wallets with banks for the operation of credit and payment cards. In Senegal, one of the difficulties in this area is the weak negotiating power of fintech companies in relation to the large billers and financial institutions. The latter sometimes impose restrictive clauses on fintech companies whose business model is essentially based on the aggregation of services.
Focus on e-money issuing activities
Electronic money represents a monetary value that is:
Electronic money issuing institutions may enter into partnership agreements with one or more technical operators. The activity of these partners must be limited to the technical processing of electronic money or its distribution under the responsibility of the issuer. In this case, the technical partner's communication activities or any other activities aimed at the public must indicate the issuing institution. The responsibility for the issuance of the currency shall lie with the issuer. The responsibility for issuing electronic money may not be outsourced to a technical operator.
With the exception of banks and financial payment institutions authorised by the law on banking regulations, no structure or institution may carry out electronic money issuing activities without having been duly approved or authorised beforehand by the Central Bank.
However, banks and financial payment institutions are required to inform the BCEAO, at least two months before the start of their electronic money issuing activities or marketing to the general public, of any new service related to electronic money.
Electronic money institutions must be authorised by the Central Bank before starting their electronic money issuing activities. The exercise by decentralised financial systems of activities related to electronic money is subject to prior authorisation from the BCEAO.
Restrictions on exchange controls
In accordance with the WAEMU Regulation on external financial relations, foreign exchange transactions, capital movements (issuance of transfers and/or receipt of funds) and settlements of any kind between a WAEMU member state and a foreign country or within the WAEMU between a resident and a non-resident, may only be carried out through the intermediary of the BCEAO, the Administration, the Post Office, an authorised intermediary or a manual exchange agent, within the framework of their respective competencies.
In addition, current payments to foreign countries are made freely through the above-mentioned intermediaries, subject to the presentation of supporting documents to these intermediaries (banks). Payments to foreign countries of XOF500,000 or less are exempt from the requirement to present the transaction documents to the bank.
Please note that an operator that is a non-WAEMU resident could open a foreign account in West African CFA francs or euro (compte étranger en francs ou en euros). In this case, the opening, operation and closure of foreign accounts in West African CFA francs or euro is free, subject to the justification of the quality and effective residence of the entity offshore. Alternatively, the non-WAEMU resident operator could open a foreign account in currencies other than the euro (US dollar) (compte étranger en dévises autre que l’Euro) subject to the prior authorisation of the BCEAO.
Article 12 of Instruction N°08/07/2011 states that it is prohibited to supply foreign currency accounts by payments in West African CFA francs or from an issuing institute that has an operating account with the French Treasury. However, foreign accounts in West African CFA francs may be freely credited with:
Foreign accounts in West African CFA francs or euro may be freely debited:
Any transaction debiting or crediting foreign accounts in West African CFA francs or euro, other than those listed in Articles 13 and 14 of Regulation 09/2010, is subject to the prior authorisation of the Directorate in charge of External Finance or the BCEAO, acting by delegation of the Minister of Finance.
Cryptocurrency issues in Senegal in relation to fintech activity
Lack of regulation regarding cryptocurrency in the WAEMU zone
As of December 2022, cryptocurrencies do not have any explicit legal status and their legal framework remains incomplete. Thus, it appears that no regulation has yet been put in place in the WAEMU zone.
Moreover, there is no community, legislative or regulatory text that sets out the conditions and/or modalities for the purchase, sale, payment and use of these cryptocurrency services in Senegal and in the WAEMU zone.
Position of the regulators
As mentioned above, none of the WAEMU member countries have adopted specific regulations for cryptocurrencies. The BCEAO and the Regional Council for Public Savings and Financial Markets (CREMPF) are the regulatory institutions that operate in the WAMU financial system and financial market. However, in terms of their use and understanding, the BCEAO and the CREMPF have different approaches.
The position of the CREMPF (now Autorité des Marchés Financiers de l’UMOA)
In a communiqué dated 18 March 2021 on the warnings to the public on speculative investment offers proposed to the public by private companies that promise high returns, the CREPMF seems to consider cryptocurrency trading, the purchase and sale of goods online and operations as falling under the public call to savings on the WAMU regional financial market, which is subject to prior approval by the CREMPF.
Also in the above-mentioned communiqué, the CREMPF invites the promoters of these structures involved in cryptocurrency trading activities, and the purchase and sale of goods online to:
The CREMPF also invites the public to be extremely vigilant and to refer only to actors or operations that have been approved by the CREMPF. In addition, the CREPMF reminds people of the following rules of vigilance before any investment:
The position of BCEAO
This activity is neither regulated nor authorised in the WAEMU zone. The BCEAO does not seem to be in favour of the development of cryptocurrencies in the region. For this reason, the BCEAO is considering setting up its own central bank digital currency in order to counter the massive entry into the WAEMU space of cryptocurrency activities and financial speculation. This is what the Nigerian central bank has done through the establishment of the E-Naira, and a similar initiative is evident in the project of the Ghanaian central bank through the introduction of the E-Cedi.
Senegalese consumer protection with impacts on the fintech business
Any electronic supplier of goods or services shall provide the consumer with the following information:
This information must be unambiguous, legible and easily and permanently accessible from the homepage of the website of the electronic goods or services provider.
66, boulevard de la République
Immeuble Seydou Nourou Tall,
1er étage
BP. 11417 Dakar, Senegal
338214722
+ 221 33 821 45 43
houda@avocatshouda.com www.avocatshouda.com