Businesses generally adopt a corporate form, with the most commonly used being joint-stock companies (Sociedades Anónimas, or S.A.) and limited liability companies (Sociedades por Quotas, or Lda). In general, joint-stock companies and limited liability companies are taxed according to similar rules, with both being treated for legal purposes (including tax) as separate entities, unless the tax transparency regime applies.
Joint-stock companies are subject to a minimum share capital of EUR50,000, represented by shares. The capital is divided into shares and the shareholders’ liability is limited to the value of the shares subscribed.
Limited liability companies must have at least two shareholders (although limited liability companies with a single shareholder are also admitted). There is no minimum share capital required. Shareholders may be jointly liable up to the amount of initial paid-in capital. Limited liability companies may be held by a single shareholder (Sociedade Unipessoal por Quotas), either upon formation or upon the redemption of the interest held in the company by other shareholders. In general, the same rules apply as for limited liability companies.
Partnerships – whether de facto or in the form of limited partnerships or limited liability partnerships – have not been recognised as such or established in either the company laws or the tax laws of Portugal. Accordingly, Portuguese tax law does not provide a comprehensive set of rules establishing how resident or non-resident partnerships/partners are taxed. Furthermore, no clear guidance is provided regarding how foreign partnerships should be respected as such or taxed as separate entities.
Notwithstanding, the Portuguese Corporate Income Tax Code (the "CIT Code") establishes a transparency regime that applies, inter alia, to certain family-owned companies dedicated to asset management, to certain companies that fall into the definition of Professional Services Firms, and to certain joint venture entities such as complementary groups of companies (Agrupamento Complementar de Empresas) and European Economic Interest Groups (Agrupamento Europeu de Interesse Económico).
Complementary groups of companies can be formed by a group of corporate entities/individuals, generally to facilitate collaboration between members in a specific business venture. A complementary group of companies has separate legal personality from its members. These entities are not subject to minimum registration capital, and members are jointly liable for the entity’s debts.
European Economic Interest Groups are meant to facilitate or develop the economic activities of their members via a pooling of resources, activities or skills, and can be formed by legal entities governed by public or private law that have been formed in accordance with the laws of an EU country and have their registered office in the EU, as well as by individuals developing an industrial, commercial, craft or agricultural activity, or providing professional or other services in the EU. They must have at least two members from different EU countries. Each member of a European Economic Interest Group has unlimited joint and several liability for the entity's debts.
In addition, Portuguese Collective Investment Vehicles apply taxation schemes that privilege investor-level income taxation to fund-level income taxation (see 2.3 Other Special Incentives).
Portuguese tax residency of corporate entities is determined based on the location of the head office or place of effective management.
The general CIT rate applicable on the Portuguese mainland is 21%, while the applicable tax rate in the Madeira Archipelago and in in the Azores Archipelago is 14.7%.
On the Portuguese mainland, entities qualifying as small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are subject to a 17% rate, which applies to the first EUR25,000 of taxable profit. The remaining profit is subject to the applicable general rates.
A state surtax applies to taxable profits exceeding EUR1.5 million, as follows:
Local surtax up to 1.5% of taxable profits is levied by municipalities.
Certain expenditures incurred by entities subject to CIT are separately subject to Autonomous Taxation (Tributação Autónoma) at varied rates, such as undocumented expenses, entertainment expenses and expenses incurred with vehicles.
Generally, taxable income derived from businesses operated directly by individuals is subject to personal income tax (PIT) and taxed as business income (Schedule B income) at progressive rates ranging from 14.5% to 48% and to a solidarity surcharge, also levied at progressive rates (2.5% to 5%), applicable to taxpayers with taxable income over EUR80,000 (see 3.2 Individual Rates and Corporate Rates).
Taxable profits are defined in the CIT Code as the sum of profits and losses (P&L) as well as the net variations in equity not reflected in P&L, as accrued and determined for accounting purposes, subject to the adjustments set forth in the CIT Code. These adjustments include:
Patent Box
The Portuguese patent box grants a deduction corresponding to 50% of the income derived as consideration from the disposal or temporary use of certain industrial property rights (patents, industrial models and copyright on computer software), including income from the violation of such rights ("qualifying income"). Qualifying income is defined as the net positive balance between the revenues and gains derived in a given taxable year as consideration from the disposal or use of qualifying industrial property rights and the research and development (R&D) expenses or losses incurred or borne in the same period by the taxpayer in connection with the industrial property right from which the gain is obtained.
This regime does not apply to any services supplied that are ancillary to a qualifying disposal or temporary use of industrial property.
Portuguese tax law establishes several tax incentives aimed at promoting certain behaviour (eg, savings) or stimulating certain activities, industries and sectors. Notable sector-specific incentives include those granted to capital markets and to the financial sector in general, to real estate development and rehabilitation, to the shipping industry, wine production, sports and cultural activities, cinema, forestry management, patronage, philanthropic activities and the co-operative sector.
Pension Funds
Generally, pension funds established according to Portuguese law are exempt from Portuguese CIT and the municipal transfer tax applicable to the sale of real estate. The CIT exemption may be extended to pension funds established under the law of another EU/EEA jurisdiction, provided the latter is bound by administrative co-operation or mutual assistance in taxation matters, when the following requirements are met:
Collective Investment Vehicles (CIVs)
Investment funds in securities, real estate investment funds, investment companies in securities and real estate investment companies established according to Portuguese law are technically subject to CIT on their taxable income; however, income typically derived by CIVs – including interest, dividends, capital gains and rents, as well as certain fees and commissions – is generally excluded from CIT. This exemption does not apply when the income is paid by an entity resident in a blacklisted jurisdiction. CIVs are exempt from municipal and state surcharges.
In addition, stamp duty applies on the net asset value of these funds on a quarterly base (at a rate of 0.0025% or 0.0125%, depending on the investment policy pursued).
Investors resident in Portugal are subject to tax on distributions, redemptions and the disposal of units or shares issued by CIVs (at different rates). Non-resident investors are exempt, except with respect to investments in real estate investment funds and companies, in which case a 10% rate applies.
Portuguese REITs and their shareholders have an income tax regime similar to real estate investment funds and companies, with the particularity that income from the sale of real estate is only excluded from tax when the immovable property has been held for renting purposes for at least three years.
Exemptions Applicable to Foreign Financial Entities
Interest payments made by resident financial institutions towards foreign financial institutions without a PE in Portugal are generally exempt from CIT (entities subject to a privileged tax regime as defined in Portuguese tax laws as well as non-resident financial institutions substantially held by resident entities are excluded). Also, gains realised by non-resident financial institutions, in the context of swap transactions entered into with a resident financial entity, are also generally exempt from CIT (similar exclusions apply).
Exemption Applicable to Debt Instruments
Non-resident entities and individuals (except those that are resident in blacklisted Jurisdictions) are exempt from CIT and PIT otherwise due on interest and capital gains derived in connection with qualifying debt instruments that benefit from the regime set forth in Decree Law 193/2005.
Debt instruments qualifying for this regime include bonds issued by public and private sector entities, money market instruments (namely treasury bills and commercial paper), perpetual bonds, convertible bonds, other convertible securities, and tier 1 and tier 2 capital instruments, regardless of the currency of issue. Qualifying instruments must be integrated in a centralised system managed by a Portuguese resident entity or by an entity established in the EU/EEA that manages an international clearing system (in the latter case, provided that the state of establishment is bound to administrative co-operation for tax purposes equivalent to the rules in force in the EU).
The beneficiaries of this exemption include central banks and government agencies, international organisations recognised by Portugal, and entities resident in a country or jurisdiction that has entered into a double tax treaty or an exchange of information agreement with other entities that are not resident in a blacklisted jurisdiction.
For resident entities, there is no distinction between ordinary income/capital gains and ordinary losses/capital losses. The carry-forward of losses is available for five years, unless the entity is a certified SME, in which case the carry-forward of losses is available for 12 years. For each year, the deduction of tax losses is limited to 70% of the taxable profit. Carry-back is not allowed.
Portuguese law establishes a general anti-loss trafficking rule, under which, loss carry-forward is not allowed if more than 50% of the entity’s ownership (share capital or voting rights) has changed between the taxable year in which such losses were generated and the end of the taxable year in which the deduction is claimed. However, several exceptions apply to the general rule (eg, when the ownership is converted from direct into indirect or from indirect into direct, and when an interest is exchanged between entities whose share capital or voting rights are held directly or indirectly by a common entity).
When no exception applies, the Minister of Finance may nevertheless approve the transfer of losses under certain conditions.
In the case of non-resident entities, no carry-forward of losses is available for business income unless such entities have a PE in Portugal. Non-residents that derive Portuguese-source capital gains and do not have a PE in Portuguese territory to which such gains are attributable are subject to tax on the balance of Portuguese-source capital gains and losses. In the case of securities, exemptions may apply (see 7. Anti-avoidance for more details).
Interest payments are, as a rule, tax deductible subject to certain limitations.
Interest Barrier Rule
Net interest expenses may be deducted up to the greater of the following limits:
It is possible to carry forward excess interest deductions and unutilised limits for five taxable years on a first-in, first-out basis, after the current year’s interest is deducted. Rules similar to the anti-loss trafficking rules detailed above also apply to excess interest deductions and unutilised limits.
Companies taxable under the Special Regime of Group Taxation (Regime Especial de Tributação dos Grupos de Sociedades, or RETGS) may elect to apply these rules on a group basis. Likewise, certain rules limit the deductibility of interest as well as the application of excess limits pertaining to pre-grouping or post-grouping taxable years.
Transfer Pricing and Shareholder Loans
In addition to the above, transfer pricing rules may limit the deductibility of interest in the case of debt arrangements entered into between related parties, if such interest is not established according to the arm’s-length principle.
Unless transfer pricing rules apply, interest and other forms of compensation agreed under financial arrangements, qualified as shareholder loans (suprimentos), cannot be deducted in excess of the rate established in a ministerial decree issued by the Minister of Finance.
The RETGS is not a consolidation regime, but rather an optional tax regime under which the "Dominant Company" of a "Group of Companies" may elect to aggregate the taxable profits and losses of any other company pertaining to the same group of companies ("Member Companies").
Under the RETGS, a Group of Companies exists when a company (the Dominant Company) directly or indirectly holds 75% of the share capital of another company or companies (the Member Companies), as long as such interest provides the Dominant Company with the majority of the voting rights in each of the Member Companies.
An election to apply the RETGS can only be filed when certain conditions applicable to the Dominant Company and to the Member Companies are cumulatively fulfilled.
The RETGS ceases to apply when any of the mandatory requirements concerning the Dominant Company are no longer fulfilled, or when the taxable profits of any of the entities forming the Group of Companies are determined according to an indirect assessment. When a Dominant Company becomes controlled by another Portuguese company that fulfils the requirement to be considered a Dominant Company (other than the requirement with respect to losses during the three previous tax periods) during the application of the RETGS, the latter may elect to continue to apply the RETGS.
Specific and strict rules apply to the carry-forward of losses during the application of the RETGS, including in cases where a non-recognition transaction occurred. Also, pre and post-RETGS loss carry-forward is limited.
In general, capital gains are considered taxable profits and are taxed at the general CIT rate. Capital losses may be deducted if the general deductibility rules are fulfilled, but not to the extent such losses relate to profits or reserves distributed or capital gains realised on the disposal of shares of the same entity in the same year or in the previous four years that benefited from the participation exemption or from the foreign (indirect) tax credit.
The participation exemption regime exempts capital gains and losses realised by Portuguese-resident companies with share transfers, provided that the following requirements are met.
The requirement of the company whose shares are disposed of being subject to an income tax with a rate not lower than 60% of the Portuguese CIT may not apply if the following types of income obtained by the relevant entity do not exceed 25% of its global amount of income:
Additionally, a rollover relief mechanism may be used to exclude 50% of the positive balance of capital gains and losses realised on the sale of tangible fixed assets, intangible assets and non-consumable biological assets, held for at least one year, from taxable income, to the extent the realisation value of such assets is wholly or partially reinvested on similar assets during a four-year reinvestment period starting in the year before and ending in the second year after the taxable period in which the realisation occurs. The law establishes specific rules to be observed, including regarding the type of assets qualifying for this regime.
When the reinvestment is not wholly or fully made until the end of the reinvestment period, the income that was not previously recognised for tax purposes must be subject to taxation in that period, increased by 15%.
Non-resident taxpayers who do not have a Portuguese-situs PE may be subject to Portuguese-source capital gain taxation on the disposal of the following assets:
There is an exemption that applies to non-resident entities or individuals deriving Portuguese-source capital gains from the disposal of shares and other securities issued by Portuguese entities, but this exemption does not apply in the following cases.
Other taxes may apply to specific transactions, namely:
Other than the taxes mentioned in 2.8 Other Taxes Payable by an Incorporated Business, a company owning real estate in Portugal is generally subject to property tax (IMI), levied at a rate ranging from 0.3% to 0.45% (urban properties) of the tax registration value. An addition to the property tax, called AIMI, may also apply.
Also, industry-specific levies may apply to companies operating in certain sectors.
Generally, most closely held local businesses operate in corporate form.
The CIT Code comprises a tax transparency regime that applies to the following entities in specific situations:
A "professional services firm" is defined as a company in which all the shareholders undertake the same type of professional activities listed in a ministerial order – doctors, dentists, lawyers, etc – and more than 75% of the income is derived from at least one qualifying professional activity, as long as its shares are held by not more than five shareholders for more than 183 days per tax year, with none of them being a public company, and at least 75% of the share capital is held by professionals who carry out such activities, totally or partially through the company.
The taxable profits are computed at a corporate level but are attributable to the shareholders and taxed as business (Schedule B) income. If the shareholder receives payments on account of future dividends during a given tax period, and such payments are in excess of the income attributed via the tax transparency regime, then the total amount of such payments should be taxed as self-employment/business income (Schedule B) for PIT purposes.
If a closely held corporation is domiciled in a blacklisted jurisdiction, it may be considered a controlled foreign company (CFC), in which case anti-deferral rules could apply. In this case, the CFC profits or income may be attributable to the individuals holding an interest in the CFC, in the proportion of such interest. Income so attributed is characterised as business (Schedule B) income if the interest is held in the context of a business activity, or as investment (Schedule E) income in all other cases.
Capital gains realised on the sale of shares by resident individuals are taxed at a special 28% rate (Schedule G income), unless the taxpayer chooses to include this income and submit it to the progressive rate structure and the solidarity surcharge, or unless the shares are issued by a non-listed micro or small-sized company, in which case only half of the capital gains are taxed, thus resulting in an effective rate of 14%.
The rules that apply to the taxation of dividends and capital gains derived by individuals from publicly traded corporations do not differ from those applicable to income derived from privately traded corporations.
Dividends received by resident individuals are taxed at a 28% flat rate (or 35% if paid by an entity resident in a blacklisted jurisdiction) unless the taxpayer elects to include this income and apply the general progressive rate structure. In this case, when dividends are distributed by Portuguese-resident companies or EU/EEA companies (in the latter case, provided that the EEA state is bound to administrative co-operation for tax purposes equivalent to the rules in force in the EU) that comply with the requirements provided in Article 2 of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive, only 50% of the dividend will be subject to tax.
Capital gains realised on the sale of shares by resident individuals are generally taxed at a special 28% rate (Schedule G), unless the taxpayer chooses to include this income and submit it to the progressive rate structure and the solidarity surcharge.
In general, interest, dividends and royalties paid by Portuguese resident companies to non-resident companies are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 25%.
Dividends, interest and royalties, among other forms of capital income, paid or made available to accounts held by one or more holders on behalf of unidentified third parties, or to entities deemed to be tax resident in blacklisted jurisdictions, should be subject to withholding tax at the rate of 35%.
Withholding tax on distributions of dividends may not take place if the Portuguese participation exemption regime is applied.
Under the Portuguese participation exemption, dividends distributed by resident entities to non-resident entities should be exempt from CIT provided that:
In order to benefit from this tax exemption, the beneficiary of the income must fulfil some formal obligations.
This exemption regime also applies to dividends distributed by a resident company to a PE located in other EU or EEA countries of an entity that meets the mentioned requirements.
On the other hand, these tax exemptions are not applicable if there is an arrangement – or several arrangements – that are not genuine whose primary purpose, or one of those, is to obtain a tax advantage that defeats the object and purpose of eliminating the double taxation of dividends. This regime should also not apply if the Portuguese distributing company has not complied with the declarative obligations imposed by the Portuguese legal regime of the beneficial owner central registry.
Regarding interest and royalties income, the withholding tax may be eliminated by the tax framework established by the EU Interest and Royalties Directive (I&RD), provided that the following requirements are met:
The payment of interest and royalties to a company or a PE resident in Switzerland may also benefit from this exemption regime, provided that the aforementioned requirements are fulfilled.
The application of this tax exemption regime also depends on the fulfilment of some formal requirements.
The beneficiary may also apply for the later reimbursement of the withheld tax within the next two years following the respective payment.
This tax exemption regime on interest and royalties payments should not be applicable to the part of the income that does not comply with the arm’s-length principle.
Portugal has so far executed 79 DTTs, 77 of which are in force. The last DTT to enter into force was with Angola.
Over the last few years, the Portuguese tax authorities (PTA) have increased their focus on cross-border tax matters, aiming to tackle treaty shopping practices, following the best international practices on the matter.
The last reports on activities developed for combating fraud and tax evasion that were released by the PTA highlighted the efforts to tackle cross-border abusive practices and an increase in the use of the international mechanisms available for the exchange of tax information.
In accordance with such reports, the PTA also intend to increase their control over cross-border transactions made between related parties, as well as over entities developing their business activities by means of new business models based on information technologies. One way to mitigate the risks arising from related-party transactions may be to execute an advance pricing agreement (APA).
The most common transfer pricing issues that foreign investors usually have to deal with regarding local corporations are related to the terms and conditions established between related parties regarding interest on financing, as well as on the amount of management fees and royalties.
The Portuguese transfer pricing regime was amended in 2019 in order to expressly establish that transfer pricing rules are applicable to corporate restructurings whenever they include the transfer of tangible or intangible assets, rights on intangible assets or compensation payments for losses.
In general, Portugal follows the OECD standards on transfer pricing issues; therefore, the PTA are legally entitled to challenge the agreements established by related parties with reference to limited risk distribution for the sale of goods or the rendering of services. The control of such arrangements is common for international corporate groups. These arrangements may also be covered by an APA.
Considering that Portugal tends to follow the OECD standards on transfer pricing matters, there are no particular differences to emphasise.
From a Portuguese tax standpoint, it is not common to settle transfer pricing disputes through DTTs and mutual agreement procedures (MAPs). Nevertheless, there are some cases duly documented in OECD statistics.
According to such statistics, at the end of 2020, Portugal had more than 90 ongoing MAPs. Eight of these cases started before 1 January 2016. Moreover, the number of ongoing MAPs related to transfer pricing cases increased to 47.
The average time needed to close MAPs related to transfer pricing issues started before 1 January 2016 was approximately 78 months. As regards the transfer pricing MAPs started after the previously mentioned date, the “start to end” timeframe was approximately 23 months.
On the other hand, the outcome of the MAPs related to transfer pricing was essentially the following:
The PTA published Guidelines for the use of the International MAP Procedures in accordance with the Double Tax Treaties entered into by Portugal, and with the Arbitration Convention – Convention 90/436/EEC, of 23 July 1990, on the elimination of double taxation in connection with the adjustment of profits of associated enterprises.
As a rule, when the PTA execute a transfer pricing adjustment for one related party in a transaction, a correlative adjustment may be made by the other related party involved in such transaction.
Additionally, several DTTs entered into by Portugal provide a mechanism under which transfer pricing adjustments made by the tax authorities in one state may lead to a correlative adjustment in the other party's state of residence for the avoidance of potential double taxation.
Finally, where a transfer pricing adjustment leads to additional tax liability towards the PTA, the relevant company should be bound to pay compensatory interest to said authorities at a rate of 4% per year. Specific penalties may also apply.
As a rule, local branches and local subsidiaries of non-local corporations are taxed on the same basis. However, the following aspects in the tax regime applicable to a local branch of a foreign corporation should be considered:
As a rule, capital gains made by non-resident entities from the transfer of stock in local corporations are subject to tax at the rate of 25%, but may be exempt from taxation in Portugal provided that certain conditions are met (see 2.7 Capital Gains Taxation for more details).
Some DTTs entered into by Portugal also establish a waiver of taxation regarding capital gains obtained from the sale of a local company, provided that such capital gains are not allocated to a PE located in the Portuguese territory.
Assuming that the beneficiary of the income is not a Portuguese tax resident, no taxation should be triggered in Portugal on capital gains arising from the transfer of non-local holding companies unless the assets of such non-local holding companies are essentially constituted by rights over real estate properties located in Portugal.
The most relevant tax issues that may be triggered by a change of control are the following:
The rules that apply to the determination and assessment of the respective taxable income are the same for local-owned and foreign-owned affiliates, including the transfer pricing rules that apply to transactions made between related parties.
As a rule, payments regarding management and administrative expenditures made to non-local affiliates are deductible for tax purposes, assuming that they are deemed necessary for the business of the local affiliate. Formal requirements regarding the documentary support of such expenses should be observed.
Finally, the terms and conditions related to the rendering of said services and the payment of the relevant fees are subject to the Portuguese transfer pricing rules and should be made according to the arm’s-length principles. Otherwise, the PTA may deny the tax deductibility of such expenses.
As a rule, there are no specific constraints, but such transactions should be made in accordance with the transfer pricing rules and the arm’s-length principle, or they risk being challenged by the PTA.
The CIT Code subjects resident companies to tax on all their income, regardless of the country of source. On the other hand, all deductible expenses are taken into account to determine the taxable income of the local company, independently from the location where such expense is incurred.
Furthermore, the CIT Code expressly provides different methods to eliminate double taxation, namely tax credit and tax exemption methods.
Regarding tax credit methods, a credit deduction for international double taxation is available for situations in which income generated abroad is included in the taxable income.
The tax credit should correspond to the income tax paid in the foreign country, or to the amount of CIT assessed before the deduction, corresponding to the net income that may be taxed in the foreign country, whichever is lower.
Additionally, if a DTT applies, the tax credit should not exceed the tax that should have been borne abroad pursuant to the terms established by the DTT.
For the exemption method, the participation exemption regime should be highlighted, as well as a special regime applicable to foreign PEs that allows the tax exemption of the income generated by them in order to mitigate distinctions between foreign subsidiaries and foreign PEs.
This regime is optional and, if exercised, has to include all the PEs located in the same territory, and should remain in force for a minimum period of three years. Additionally, the following requirements should be met:
This last requirement may not apply if the following types of income obtained by the PE do not exceed 25% of its global amount of income:
Moreover, the Portuguese company cannot choose to exclude the profits assessed by the foreign PE from its taxable income, up to the amount of tax losses assessed by such PE that have concurred to determine the Portuguese company’s taxable income in the previous five fiscal years, or the previous 12 fiscal years for small and medium companies.
The Portuguese company also cannot choose to include the losses assessed by the foreign PE in its taxable income, up to the amount of profits that such PE has assessed that have not concurred to determine the Portuguese company’s taxable income in the previous five fiscal years, or the previous 12 fiscal years for small and medium companies.
The optional regime mentioned above with reference to foreign PEs of Portuguese companies should be considered in light of local expenses. Provided that the same regime applies, the expenses made by the foreign PE are not deductible to determine the taxable income of the Portuguese company.
As a rule, dividends from foreign subsidiaries are considered taxable income for the resident shareholder and subject to taxation at the rates stated in the Portuguese CIT Code. However, tax relief or even a tax exemption may be obtained in accordance with the applicable DTT.
In order to avoid economic double taxation, the Portuguese CIT Code sets out a participation exemption regime, pursuant to which, inbound dividends may be exempt from CIT, provided that the following requirements are cumulatively met.
This tax exemption is subject to a specific anti-abuse clause, pursuant to which, it should not be applicable if there is an arrangement or several arrangements, not deemed as genuine, that have been put into place for the main purpose or one of the main purposes of obtaining a tax advantage defeating the object and purpose of eliminating the double taxation of dividends, taking into consideration all the relevant facts and circumstances.
For this purpose, an arrangement, or a set of arrangements, should be considered as non-genuine when it is not put into place for valid economic reasons and does not reflect economic substance.
Please see 2.2 Special Incentives for Technology Investments regarding the patent box regime.
The Portuguese CFC rules contained in the CIT Code closely follow the CFC regimes that have been adopted by several other EU countries.
According to the Portuguese CFC rules, the income generated by a CFC is allocated and subject to taxation in the hands of the CFC’s shareholders regardless of any dividend distribution if:
However, the CFC rules do not apply if the following types of income obtained by the foreign entity do not exceed 25% of its global amount of income (“active non-resident entity”):
Also CFC rules do not apply when the foreign entity is resident in another member state of the EU/EEA (in the latter case, provided that the EEA member state is bound to administrative co-operation for tax purposes equivalent to the rules in force in the EU), and the shareholder shows that the setting up and activity of such foreign entity is grounded in valid economic reasons and that the entity develops an agricultural, industrial or commercial business activity or provides services, having for that purpose employees, equipment, assets and business facilities.
With the exception of the mentioned CFC rules, as well as the substance rules provided by the participation exemption regime and the exemption regime applicable to capital gains made by foreign entities, there are no specific rules regarding the substance of non-local affiliates. Nevertheless, the Portuguese CIT Code sets forth that a company may be considered a tax resident if its effective management takes place in Portugal.
Please see 2.7 Capital Gains Taxation.
There is a general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) under which the PTA can disqualify, for tax purposes, the typical effect of an arrangement or a series of arrangements that, having been put into place for the main purpose or one of the main purposes of obtaining a tax advantage that defeats the object or purpose of the applicable tax law, are executed with an abuse of legal forms or are not genuine, having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances.
Where an arrangement or a series thereof is disqualified for tax purposes, the tax liability shall be calculated in accordance with the tax rules applicable to the arrangements corresponding to the underlying substance or economic reality.
For these purposes, an arrangement or a series of arrangements shall be regarded as non-genuine to the extent that it is not put into place for valid economic reasons that reflect economic reality.
Whenever the GAAR applies, the compensatory interest rate levied by the tax authorities will be increased to 19%.
By the end of 2021, the EU Commission has adopted a proposal for a Council Directive laying down rules to prevent the misuse of shell entities for tax purposes and to amend Directive 2011/16/EU on Administrative Cooperation (DAC) (COM (2021) 565 final).
The adoption of this Directive will require unanimity within the Council. Once approved, it shall be transposed into Portuguese legislation.
While there is no routine audit cycle that applies to all companies, the PTA prepare a National Tax and Customs Inspections Plan on a yearly basis. This plan establishes the programmes and criteria for tax inspections, directing the audit activities of the tax authorities.
Furthermore, the PTA created a Large Taxpayers Unit, which supports compliance and constantly monitors the tax activity of large taxpayers.
Portugal has already implemented several BEPS measures, such as the ones that follow:
Portugal is also a signatory of the Multilateral Instrument (MLI).
Some of the actions mentioned above are the result of the implementation of EU directives addressing some of the key factors identified by the BEPS Action Plan.
As an EU and OECD member, Portugal is committed to the implementation of the BEPS Action Plan. Several BEPS measures have already been implemented, whether by unilateral decision or by implementation of EU directives dealing with the same tax challenges that are identified in several BEPS actions. Thus, for the next few years, the BEPS Action Plan should not give rise to any relevant tax reform in Portugal.
However, there are some specific tax issues that led to slight amendments during 2019. For instance, Law No 32/2019, of May 3rd, was approved, introducing amendments to the CFC rules, interest barrier rules, exit tax and the GAAR in order to conclude the transposition into the Portuguese tax system of the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD). Also, Law No 119/2019, of September 18th, introduced amendments to the transfer pricing rules, which have been recently supplemented by Ministerial Order No 267/2021 and Ministerial Order No 268/2021.
Further to the agreement reached within the OECD regarding a two-pillar solution to address the tax challenges arising from digitalisation, the EU Commission has approved a proposal for a Council Directive aimed at ensuring a global minimum level of taxation for multinational groups in the Union consistent with the two-pillar solution (COM/2021/823 final). The proposal will need to be unanimously agreed in Council, before entering into force and being transposed.
Portugal enacted major corporate tax reform in 2014 aimed at increasing competitiveness, allowing stability and attracting investment in order to relaunch the Portuguese economy.
Such corporate tax reform, along with other changes in the economic environment, contributed to bringing international investment and, consequently, international taxation to a high level of attention in Portugal.
Moreover, in order to protect the legal framework arising from said tax reform and assure stability for investors, the solutions adopted have already taken into account the international trends in corporate taxation, namely regarding BEPS Action Plan discussion.
Considering the high level of implementation that the BEPS Action Plan already has in the Portuguese corporate tax framework as a result of the solutions established by said tax reform, no relevant developments on these matters are expected in the near future.
Please see the previous sections in relation to this matter.
Reference should be made to the relevant preceding sections.
As an EU member state, Portugal is subject to state aid constraints in force within the EU. Portugal has put in place several tax incentive regimes that are generally designed to meet the standards and thresholds provided in EU law.
Furthermore, companies licensed to operate within the Madeira Free Trade Zone are subject to a special tax regime, including a corporate income tax rate reduction. This special tax regime has recently been extended by way of Law No 21/2021, of 20 April 2021 until 2027.
The EU Commission has reviewed the regime in force until 2013 and has found that it was not in line with the Commission's State aid decisions of 2007 and 2013 that entitled Portugal to approve the regime.
Portugal has challenged the EU Commission’s decision before the European Court of Justice (Case T-95/21) and the case is pending.
As mentioned above, as an EU country, Portugal is subject to the two EU anti-tax avoidance directives, ATAD and ATAD 2, which establish anti-hybrid rules aimed to cover hybrid mismatches. Anti-hybrid rules established in ATAD 2 were implemented by Law 24/2020, of July 6th.
As a rule, Portuguese tax-resident entities and individuals are subject to income taxation based on their worldwide income. However, new territorial features were introduced by the CIT reform in 2014, including a participation exemption applicable to capital gains and losses, an exemption applicable to gains derived upon the liquidation of non-resident entities, and an elective regime under which profits attributable to foreign PEs may be exempt from CIT in Portugal.
Following the trend established in Germany and Spain, in 2012 Portugal introduced a BEPS-compliant restructuring of its interest deductibility limitations, including a so-called EBITDA rule, which is in line with BEPS Action 4.
Portugal does not have a territorial tax regime.
Some of the Portuguese DTTs already have limitations of benefits, as well as principal purpose test (PPT)-type provisions. Notwithstanding, the PPT provision should be adopted with the MLI.
Following the examples in other EU countries, the PTA are expected to strengthen their scrutiny of the applicability of DTTs. As such, foreign groups with current investments in Portugal should re-evaluate the substance of their investment and financing structures, as well as how they are deploying intangibles in their Portuguese businesses. Portuguese groups using EU holding platforms may also consider restructuring in light of recent developments in Portugal.
Since 2000, Portugal has had a transfer pricing regime aligned with the OECD guidelines, and for the time being there are no proposed changes. The tax authorities and clients seek direction in the guidelines, and, as such, any further changes to it might have consequences. Generally, the taxation of profits related to intellectual property has not triggered increased controversy in recent years compared to pre-BEPS levels.
The transparency and CbC regimes being proposed and implemented, together with the instruments developed in recent years to exchange information automatically or upon request, contribute positively to a fairer international tax environment.
Ultimately, positive spillovers are to be expected as governments and the international organisations with tax policy roles are able to advance the tax system by enforcing taxation where value is created, in a world where digitalised models are also changing the rules of the game.
From a different perspective, the thresholds defined – namely regarding the application of CbC reporting – ensure that these rules will not disturb the functioning of the economy, particularly in companies that do not have a significant multinational footprint.
No substantial changes have yet been implemented to address concerns regarding the taxation of digital economy businesses for CIT purposes.
Recently, Law 74/2020, of November 19th, transposing Directive (EU) 2018/1808 of November 14th, introduced the payment of an advertising tax, applicable to audio-visual on-demand services or video-sharing platform services, as well as an annual levy of 1% payable by audio-visual on-demand service operators (the so-called Netflix Tax).
For VAT purposes, relevant changes have already entered into force to tackle the challenges of allocating indirect taxation rights in a fair manner in the digital economy.
Please see 9.12 Taxation of Digital Economy Businesses.
The income paid in relation to offshore IP is subject to withholding tax at the aggravated rate of 35%. Moreover, payments made in connection with offshore IP may not be deductible if the local paying company is not able to demonstrate that such payments correspond to existing operations and are not in an exaggerated amount.
Rua Castilho, 165
1070-050
Lisboa
Portugal
+351 213 817 400
+351 213 817 499
mlgtslisboa@mlgts.pt www.mlgts.ptIntroduction
Around the world, changes in tax policy during 2021 still reflected the global impact of the health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. In Portugal, the State Budget Proposal for 2022 has been voted down, which led to the dissolution of the Portuguese Parliament, and the future remains uncertain with regard to the tax policy applicable in 2022. However, the fact that Portuguese voters have re-elected the former government party with a majority in the Parliament seems to indicate political stability and the likelihood of the approval of the State Budget for 2022 that was previously rejected.
Remote Working – Tax Impacts Arising from the New Settings of Employment Relationships
Before COVID-19, remote working was an unattainable goal for some employees and seen as a business disruption by employers. However, the pandemic has forced governments to restrict travel, preventing many employees from performing their activities in their country of employment and forcing employers to swiftly adapt to the new reality and implement flexible work policies.
Permanent Establishment Risks
Now, the possibility of remote working is seen as valuable by employees, because it improves their work-life balance, and is a pivotal and differentiating factor when choosing where to work. Therefore, employers are becoming more flexible, accommodating employees’ preferences to work remotely, which requires a thorough evaluation of the tax risks that may arise with the “new normal”, notably in terms of permanent establishment (PE) risks.
Under the Corporate Income Tax Code (the "CIT Code"), a foreign company would be deemed to have a PE in Portuguese territory if:
The application of Portuguese legislation is limited by the provisions of an applicable double tax treaty (DTT), which prevails over domestic law. Therefore, as the majority of the DTTs to which Portugal is a signatory follow the previous OECD standard and are not aligned with the current wording of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital, there are practical issues regarding the application of Portuguese law.
The Portuguese Tax and Customs Authority (PTA) remains silent, even though remote working already has a wide use and should continue to increase in the post-COVID-19 era. Despite the absence of guidance from the PTA regarding the tax impacts arising from remote working and its likelihood of triggering a Portuguese PE, and without legal amendments that accommodate this new reality, it is essential to address this topic.
In particular, the authors take the view that the mere fact that the employee is working remotely from Portugal is not sufficient to trigger a PE in Portugal. In other words, if the employee keeps the exact same functions and the sole link to Portugal is their physical presence, the employer should not have a Portuguese PE, provided that it is only responding to a personal choice of the employee, who has decided, or has no other option but, to work remotely.
On the contrary, the circumstance of having an employee working remotely in Portugal could indeed trigger a PE to the extent that the activity of the employee would correspond to the core business of the employer, the activity of the employer would be oriented to the Portuguese jurisdiction and the employee’s day-to-day functions would be pivotal to develop the business plan and attain the objectives of the company in Portugal, or the employee was required, by the employer, to work remotely from Portugal.
In 2022, it is important for the Portuguese legislator to amend tax law to specifically address remote working situations in order to keep pace with the change in business and technology.
Home Offices
At the end of 2021, Law No 83/2021, of December 6th ("Law 83/2021"), was approved, amending the legal regime applicable to remote working.
Under Law 83/2021, employers are required to provide employees with compensation related to the additional expenses incurred through remote working; such as the acquisition of equipment necessary to perform the employees’ activities, an increment of costs relating to energy and the internet, as well as costs concerning the maintenance of employees’ equipment.
From a tax perspective, such compensation related to the additional expenses incurred because of remote working will not be deemed, at the level of the employee, as taxable income and, at the level of the employer entity, will be considered as a deductible expense for corporate income tax purposes.
However, the employee would have to demonstrate an increase in the expenses by comparing the values incurred in the given tax year with those pertaining to the previous year.
The regime of Law 83/2021 is therefore quite burdensome because it requires employees to keep track of all the expenses related to utilities and equipment, and employers to request documentation to support the amounts that will be paid, which will benefit from the exemption from payroll taxes. Moreover, it is a very unambitious set of rules as it departs from a mere increase of expenses when it should consider home working as the new normal and therefore compensate the employee not by establishing a parallel between the level of expenses before home offices became the rule but rather allow for a design of a salary package that considers utilities and the purchase and maintenance of equipment as true professional expenses.
Therefore, from a tax perspective, a fairer solution would be to set forth that employers may “co-finance” the expenses related to, for example, electricity and the internet and the purchase and repairments of office equipment, given that these expenses are instrumental for the performance of the professional activity, by defining a maximum monthly amount under which no personal income tax (PIT) or social security contributions would apply. Conversely, any amounts above that predefined threshold payable to employees would be subject to PIT and social security. With regard to, for instance, business trips made by employees, a predefined amount below which no tax and social security contributions would apply is already a criterion in use to compensate employees for such trips. Under the current regime of business trips, it is not necessary to have an exact correlation between expenses incurred by the employee and the amount granted to them by the employer, precisely because the threshold defined by the Portuguese legislator allows the exclusion of these payments as employment income.
Such a solution is not particularly demanding as it does not require the employee to demonstrate any expenses and a similar solution could be adopted for compensating employees for home office work.
Unfortunately, the current regime constitutes a significant challenge for taxpayers as it might lead to legal uncertainty and to an increase of tax litigation in this regard, given that the administrative burden will require companies and employees to demonstrate that the expense to be compensated should indeed be exempt from PIT and social security contributions.
ATAD 3 – a Boost to the Market of Regulated Financial Entities?
On 22 December 2021, the EU Commission released a proposal for a directive to prevent the misuse of shell entities for tax purposes and to amend the Directive on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation (DAC) – commonly designated as the “Unshell Directive” or “ATAD 3” (which is expected to be applicable as from 1 January 2024, with its implementation beginning in 2023).
In a nutshell, ATAD 3 aims at preventing tax avoidance and evasion practices linked to the use of entities that do not have any, or have only minimal, substance. Only entities that are deemed to have a high risk of having a low economic substance are subject to reporting obligations under ATAD 3 and subsequent scrutiny by the PTA. An entity is considered as a high-risk entity if the following cumulative requirements are met:
High-risk entities will be required to declare in their annual tax returns if the requirements of minimum substance regarding premises, EU bank accounts and exclusive local directors dedicated to the group of companies or full-time local employees are met.
If the requirements are not met, entities will be deemed not to have minimal substance for tax purposes and will be prevented from requesting a certificate of tax residence for use outside the jurisdiction of tax residence and accessing benefits established in EU directives and DTTs.
Notwithstanding the above, EU member states shall ensure that listed companies, regulated financial entities, holding companies that are resident for tax purposes in the same EU member state as their shareholders or the ultimate parent entity, and entities that have at least five full-time employees involved in operations are not subject to ATAD 3.
While ATAD 3 is yet to be implemented by EU member states, it is expected that multinational groups of companies will promote substance assessments in order to anticipate potential impacts arising from the implementation of the new rules and avoid the reputational risks arising from making a declaration of having a high risk of having a low economic substance.
Taking into account that regulated financial entities are excluded from the scope of ATAD 3, and have low maintenance costs, it is also expected that the Portuguese market for investment funds may benefit from this new set of rules.
Withholding Tax (WHT) Applicable to Dividends Obtained in Portugal by Non-EU Investment Funds
One of these cases has reached the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and a decision was issued in mid-March 2022, confirming that there is a breach that renders Portuguese domestic WHT provisions incompatible with the free movement of capital.
The decision will have a direct impact on several cases pending the ECJ's position in this leading case and paves the way for the elimination of WHT on dividends received by collective investment undertakings throughout Europe.
In light of the above, relevant amendments to the Portuguese legislation are expected in 2022, with the purposes of tackling this discriminatory treatment and increasing the legal certainty for non-resident investment funds investing in Portuguese companies.
The decision will have a direct impact on several cases pending the ECJ's position in this leading case and paves the way for the elimination of WHT on dividends received by collective investment undertakings throughout Europe.
In light of the above, relevant amendments to the Portuguese legislation are expected in 2022, with the purposes of tackling this discriminatory treatment and increasing the legal certainty for non-resident investment funds investing in Portuguese companies.
DAC6 – Overview of Reported Mechanisms and Legal Privilege
Portugal has adopted Council Directive (EU) 2018/822, of 25 May 2018 (DAC6), which sets forth mandatory disclosure rules regarding certain cross-border tax mechanisms that meet at least one of the specified hallmarks.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Portugal postponed for six months the reporting obligations set forth in DAC6 and the first reports took place at the beginning of 2021. Portugal also delayed the approval of the official reporting forms and the publishing of the official guidelines issued by the PTA on the matter.
In the transposition process, Portugal decided to extend the territorial reach of DAC6 to purely domestic transactions, as well as the scope of the reporting obligations to value added tax, and adopted a peculiar position as regards professional privilege, setting forth the exact same rules for intermediaries covered (or not) by legal or contractual privilege.
In December 2021, the PTA published a debriefing note regarding the mechanisms that had been reported under DAC6 since its entry into force in Portugal and until 31 October 2021. According to the document, the majority of the 119 reported mechanisms were reported directly by the relevant taxpayers, had a cross-border nature and related to the following hallmarks:
The PTA has also published three examples of reported mechanisms, including:
Despite the list of examples and the information on the transactions reported, a year has gone by and the guidelines issued by the PTA in January 2021 remain unchanged, preventing taxpayers and intermediaries from having additional clarifications regarding the application of DAC6, which is crucial, given the wide scope of the hallmarks and the potential impact on all taxpayers and intermediaries in terms of compliance costs.
With regard to the reporting obligations applicable to intermediaries with legal privilege (such as lawyers), the Portuguese Ombudsman has considered that the Portuguese transposition of DAC6 breaches legal professional privilege under Portuguese law and has requested the Constitutional Court to declare that this set of rules is in breach of the Portuguese Constitution. It is expected that the Constitutional Court’s decision regarding this regime will be known in 2022.
The Danish Cases and the (Re)design of Financing of Portuguese Companies
In February 2019, the ECJ issued ground-breaking decisions in six cases that dealt with the interpretation of the Parent-Subsidiary Directive and the Interest and Royalties Directive, relating to beneficial ownership and tax avoidance (the "Danish Cases"), regarding the exemption from WHT when dividends and interest payments were made from a Danish company to a company resident in an EU member state, which passed on the payments to an ultimate parent company residing in a third country, which would not have access to the Directives’ benefits.
In the Danish Cases, aside from broadening the definition of tax avoidance, the ECJ also clarified that the term "beneficial owner", under the Interest and Royalties Directive, should be interpreted as the entity that benefits economically from interest received and has the power to freely determine the use of interest.
In Portugal, the PTA has reinforced tax inspections regarding the application of WHT obligations under the aforementioned directives, departing from the stricter interpretation of beneficial ownership provided by the Danish Cases, which is not aligned with Portuguese domestic law.
This approach from the PTA may lead companies to assess alternative funding arrangements, such as the one described below.
Under Decree-Law No 193/2005, of June 7th ("DL 193/2005"), investment income (including interest) and capital gains arising from bonds are exempt from tax in Portugal provided the bondholders qualify as non-Portuguese residents without a PE in Portugal to which such income is attributable.
To benefit from the WHT exemption, the bonds shall be integrated in:
In addition, the beneficiaries shall be:
Taking into account the current interpretation from the PTA regarding beneficial ownership, some multinational groups may wish to revisit the way they finance their activities and opt for being financed through the issuance of bonds, under DL 193/2005, rather than turning to intra-group financing. Therefore, 2022 may be a year of significant changes with regard to the financing of Portuguese companies.
Outlook for 2022
In 2022, Portugal will start implementing its Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP), which consists of 83 investments and 32 reforms, with the aim of preparing Portugal for the challenges and opportunities arising from green and digital transitions. The RRP will be supported by EUR13.9 billion in grants and EUR2.7 billion in loans, and it is expected to lift Portugal’s gross domestic product by 1.5% to 2.4% by 2026 (Portugal’s Recovery and Resilience Plan, European Commission).
With the election of a new majority government, it is expected that 2022 and the next four years will be stable from a political standpoint, which is crucial to promote an investor-friendly environment, to increase economic growth and to implement tax reforms.
As mentioned previously, the re-election of the former government party with a majority in the Parliament seems to indicate the approval of the State Budget for 2022 that was previously rejected by the Parliament, which sets forth a reduced set of amendments to the CIT Code. The extinction of the special payment on account, the revision of the patent box regime, promoting the competitiveness of the Portuguese regime compared to other EU member states and the Tax Incentive to Recovery are proposals that are worth highlighting, given their relevance to attracting foreign investment and to helping Portuguese companies recover from the negative impacts arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Moreover, with another budget law to be proposed in October (to stimulate the economy in 2023), the taxation of cryptocurrency assets – which, up until now, has been outside the scope of the expected amendments in tax law – may be brought to the agenda. 2022 should therefore be a year with several amendments to Portuguese domestic tax law.