In the financial sector of the People's Republic of China (the PRC; for the purpose of this article only, this excludes Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan), the People’s Bank of China (PBOC) has historically assumed multiple functions, such as monetary policy, financial operations and organisational management. With the complexity of the financial risk structure, the problem of lack of co-ordination and lack of supervision in financial supervision emerges. In 2017, the Financial Stability and Development Committee of the State Council (the "Financial Committee") was established to co-ordinate the major issues of financial reform, development and supervision, and to enhance the authority and effectiveness of financial supervision.
Besides the PBOC, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC), the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) and the Ministry of Finance (MOF) are taking important roles in banking supervision in the PRC.
The PBOC is the PRC’s central bank, and its primary responsibilities include formulating and implementing monetary policies, and maintaining the stability of the banking industry. As the main agency for regulating and supervising banking institutions in the PRC and their conduct in the market, the CBIRC protects the legitimate rights and interests of stakeholders, including depositors. The SAFE is responsible for the administration of the country’s foreign exchange reserves and cross-border funds flow, and for monitoring the balance of payments and external credit and debt. The main duties of the MOF include drafting regulations on fiscal, financial and accounting management and overseeing the implementation of them, as well as developing treasury management and centralised treasury payment systems.
The principal laws and regulations governing the PRC’s banking sector include the following, amongst others:
In order to conduct banking services in the PRC, a PRC-based commercial bank should apply for a financial licence from the CBIRC and a business licence from the department of industry and commerce administration.
Activities and Services Covered
According to Article 3 of the Law on Commercial Banks, once authorised, a commercial bank may conduct the following business activities in part or in whole:
Conditions for Authorisation
Pursuant to the Law on Commercial Banks, the requirements for establishing a commercial bank include:
According to the Regulation on the Administration of Foreign-Funded Banks, the minimum amount of paid-in registered capital of a wholly foreign-funded bank or a Sino-foreign equity joint venture bank shall be CNY1 billion, or its equivalent in freely convertible currency. The head office of a wholly foreign-funded bank or a Sino-foreign equity joint venture bank shall provide working capital to branches formed within the PRC, the sum of which shall not exceed 60% of the total capital of the head office. The head office of a foreign bank shall provide working capital of no less than CNY200 million, or its equivalent in freely convertible currency, to its branch, free of charge.
The Process for Applying
According to the Law on Commercial Banks, the following materials shall first be submitted to the CBIRC:
Once these materials are submitted, the applicant shall fill in a formal application, attaching the following documents and materials:
Timelines and Costs for Authorisation
According to the Measures for the Administration of Licences of Banking and Insurance Institutions, a banking institution formed with approval shall obtain a licence from the CBIRC or its local office within ten days of receiving an administrative licensing decision.
For foreign applicants, according to the Regulation on the Administration of Foreign-Funded Banks, the CBIRC shall make a decision on approval within two months of receiving the complete application materials, and shall notify the applicant in writing. Once approved, the CBIRC or its local offices shall issue a financial licence.
Pursuant to the Chinese laws and regulations in effect, there is currently no cost for applying for a financial licence.
According to the Law on Commercial Banks, any change in the shareholders who hold more than 5% of the total amount of capital or shares of a commercial bank shall be subject to the approval of the CBIRC.
The Interim Measures for the Equity Management of Commercial Banks issued in 2018 (the "Measures") impose implementation rules on the management of commercial bank equity, setting different regulatory conditions according to the different shareholding ratios of the commercial banks’ shareholders. The Measures have tightened the CBIRC's regulation of information disclosure and reporting requirements by requiring major shareholders holding 5% or more of the shares or voting rights of a commercial bank, or holding less than 5% of the total capital or total shares while having a significant impact on the operation and management of the commercial bank, to disclose certain information.
Chinese-Funded Banks
According to the Implementation Measures for the Administrative Licensing Items concerning Chinese-Funded Commercial Banks (2022 Amendment), a change of equity for different kinds of Chinese-funded commercial banks must meet the following requirements.
State-owned commercial bank, the Postal Savings Bank or a joint-stock commercial bank
An application for the change of a shareholder holding 5% or more of the total capital or shares shall be accepted, reviewed and decided by the CBIRC, as shall an application for an overseas financial institution’s equity investment.
Shareholders holding more than 1% but less than 5% of the total capital or shares shall report to the CBIRC within ten days after the equity transfer.
Urban commercial banks
An application for the change of a shareholder holding 5% or more of the total capital or shares shall be accepted, reviewed and decided by the local provincial CBIRC branch, as shall an application for an overseas financial institution’s equity investment.
Shareholders holding more than 1% but less than 5% of the total capital or shares shall report to the local provincial CBIRC branch within ten days after the equity transfer.
Rural commercial banks
According to the Implementation Measures for the Administrative Licensing Matters of Rural Small and Medium-sized Banking Institutions (2022 Amendment) (the "Implementation Measures"), the transferee of equity in a rural banking institution shall meet the conditions of founder-members as set forth in the Implementation Measures.
In addition, changes of shareholders holding more than 1% but less than 5% of the total capital shall be reported by the banking institution to the local municipal or provincial CBIRC branch. An application for a change of shareholders holding more than 5% but less than 10% of the total capital shall be accepted, reviewed and decided by the local municipal or provincial CBIRC branch. An application for a change of shareholders holding more than 10% of the total capital shall be accepted by the local municipal CBIRC branch, reviewed and decided by the local provincial CBIRC branch, and reported to the CBIRC after the fact.
Foreign-Funded Banks
According to the Regulation on the Administration of Foreign-Funded Banks, a foreign-funded bank changing its shareholders or adjusting the shareholding proportion of its shareholders is subject to approval by the CBIRC, and shall submit application materials as required and go through the relevant registration procedures with the administration for market regulation.
According to the Notice by the CBIRC Regarding Issuing the Corporate Governance Standards for Banking or Insurance Institutions launched in 2021, banking institutions shall continue to raise the level of corporate governance to gradually reach the standards of good corporate governance, including the following:
In accordance with the Company Law of the PRC, a banking institution shall establish a corporate governance structure consisting of:
A banking institution shall disclose important information on the company, including its financial condition, information on material risk, and information on corporate governance. A comprehensive risk management system that is proportional to the risk condition of the company and covers all business processes and operational steps shall be established within the banking institution.
A banking institution shall produce articles of associates and procedural rules for the shareholders' meeting, the board of directors' meeting and the board of supervisors' meeting, as well as its risk tolerance, risk management and internal control policies.
Chinese-Funded Banks
Persons required to go through the licensing process
Pursuant to the Implementation Measures of the CBIRC for the Administrative Licensing Items concerning Chinese-Funded Commercial Banks (2022 Amendment), the chairman or vice chairman of the board, independent directors, other members of the board or the secretary to the board of a Chinese-funded commercial bank shall go through the licensing for its office qualification with the CBIRC or its local branches.
The president or vice president, assistant to the president, chief risk officer, chief compliance officer, general auditor, general accountant, chief information officer or senior executives of the same rank of a Chinese-funded commercial bank shall also go through the licensing for its office qualifications with the CBIRC or its local branches.
The chairman or vice chairman of the board, the president (or the general manager) or vice president (or the vice general manager) or the chief representative of an overseas branch of a Chinese-funded commercial bank hired from within the PRC shall go through the licensing for its office qualification with the CBIRC or its local branches.
Conditions
To apply for qualification as a director or senior executive of a Chinese-funded commercial bank, the proposed person must perform the duties of loyalty and diligence to the financial institution, and have the following:
To apply for the qualifications of a director of a Chinese-funded commercial bank, the applicant must also:
Process for licensing
An application for qualification as a director or senior executive of a state-owned commercial bank, the Postal Savings Bank or a joint-stock commercial bank, and for qualification as a chairman or vice chairman of the board, the president (or general manager) or vice president (or vice general manager) of an overseas branch of said bank hired from within the PRC, shall be submitted to the CBIRC by the banking institution, which will be accepted, reviewed and decided within 30 days from the date of acceptance by the CBIRC.
The application for the qualifications of directors and senior executive of an urban commercial bank institution, its branches or its branch-level franchised institutions, as well as the qualification as a chairman or vice chairman of the board, the president (or general manager) or vice president (or vice general manager) of an overseas branch of said bank hired from within the PRC, shall be submitted by the banking institutions to the local municipal or provincial branch of the CBIRC for preliminary review. The provincial branch of the CBIRC will make a written decision of approval or disapproval within 30 days from the date of acceptance.
If the proposed person has previously served as the chairman of the board of directors or a senior manager of a financial institution, an audit report on the performance of duties by said person shall also be submitted.
Foreign-Funded Banks
General requirements
A director, senior executive or chief representative of a foreign-funded bank shall not take office before their office qualification is confirmed by the CBIRC or its local office.
Conditions
A proposed person shall not serve as director, senior executive or chief representative of a foreign-funded bank if such person:
Process
After a foreign-funded bank submits the application materials for confirmation of satisfaction of office qualifications, the CBIRC or its local office may hold an interview with the proposed person before they take office.
Directors, senior executives and chief representatives of a foreign-funded bank that is subject to confirmation of satisfaction of office qualifications shall be governed by the provisions of the rules on administrative licensing of foreign-funded banks.
Accountability Requirements
A director of a banking institution shall perform the following duties or obligations:
A senior management officer of a banking institution shall comply with laws, regulations, regulatory provisions and the banking institution’s articles of association, engage in proper professional conduct, abide by high standards of professional ethics, meet obligations of loyalty and diligence to the company, perform duties in good faith, dutifully and prudentially, guarantee that they have sufficient time and energy to perform duties, and not be slack in performing duties nor perform duties beyond their authority.
Banking Institutions' Remuneration Requirements
The Notice of CBIRC on Issuing the Supervisory Guidelines on Sound Compensation in Commercial Banks (2010) applies to employees of commercial banks, and the Notice by the CBIRC on Issuing the Guiding Opinions on Establishing and Improving the Mechanism of Banking and Insurance Institutions for the Recourse and Deduction of Performance-Based Compensation (2021) mainly applies to personnel who receive performance-based compensation from banking institutions, including directors, supervisors, senior executives and personnel holding key positions in the banking institution.
A commercial bank shall design a uniform compensation management system, which shall be composed of:
Compensation mechanism
The compensation mechanism shall be in line with the following principles:
Compensation management system
The compensation management system shall include:
Performance-based compensation
Under any of the following circumstances, a banking institution shall recover and deduct the performance-based compensation of senior executives and personnel holding key positions with main responsibility during the corresponding period, in whole, and recover and deduct the performance-based compensation of other responsible persons during the corresponding period, in part:
The Regulator's Supervisory Regime
The CBIRC shall regard the compensation management of a commercial bank as an important item of corporate governance and assess the soundness and effectiveness of the compensation management mechanism of the commercial bank once a year. It shall also monitor the dynamic information about implementation of the compensation management system of commercial banks, and conduct on-site inspection of the commercial banks' execution of the risk control indicators and other indicators for assessment.
Consequences of Breaching the Requirements
According to the Notice of CBIRC on Issuing the Supervisory Guidelines on Sound Compensation in Commercial Banks (2010), if the compensation management system and the performance assessment indicators of a commercial bank do not meet the relevant provisions, the CBIRC has the power to order it to make a correction under relevant provisions of the PRC Banking Supervision Law, and to investigate and deal with any failure to:
The main AML laws and regulations applicable to the banking sector are:
The main requirements include that financial institutions, including commercial banks, shall:
Banking institutions set up within the PRC shall adopt relevant measures for prevention and supervision according to the law and establish:
Under the risk-based principle and the principle of regulating legal persons, the PBOC and its branch offices shallrationally use various regulation methods to realise effective regulation of different types of financial institutions. The PBOC and its branch offices may also notify the CBIRC or its branches of the supervision and administration of financial institutions' efforts to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism.
Where a financial institution violates the relevant AML and CFT provisions, the PBOC or its branch offices would recommend that the CBIRC makes the following orders:
The Law on Commercial Banks includes a chapter on the protection of depositors.
Principles
According to the Law on Commercial Banks, regarding protections for depositors, commercial banks shall follow the principles of voluntary deposit and free withdrawal, paying interest to depositors and maintaining confidentiality for depositors in handling individual savings deposits.
Commercial banks have the right to refuse to allow any entity or individual to inquire about, freeze or deduct individual savings accounts or the account of an enterprise, unless it is otherwise prescribed by law.
Protection Regime
A commercial bank shall determine its own interest rates in accordance with the upper and lower limits for deposit interests set by the PBOC, and make an announcement.
A commercial bank shall pay a certain amount of deposit reserve fund to the PBOC and keep adequate payment funds in accordance with the provisions of the PBOC.
A commercial bank shall guarantee the payment of principal and interest on the deposits, and shall not delay or refuse to pay the principal or interest on the deposits.
Deposit Insurance System
The Deposit Insurance Regulation implemented in May 2015 stipulates that the deposit insurance fund formed by insurance premiums shall be managed and used by the Deposit Insurance Fund Management Co. Ltd., established by the PBOC.
Deposit-absorbing financial institutions formed within the PRC are institutional policyholders that pay insurance premiums to the Deposit Insurance Fund Management Co. Ltd. The insurance premium payable by an institutional policyholder shall be calculated on the basis of the insured deposits of the institutional policyholder and the applicable insurance rates determined by the Deposit Insurance Fund Management Co. Ltd.
Under any of the following circumstances, a depositor has the right to request the Deposit Insurance Fund Management Co. Ltd. to use the deposit insurance fund to pay its insured deposits, up to the limit of CNY500,000:
If the amount of principal and interest on deposits in all insured deposit accounts owned by the same depositor at the same institutional policyholder is less than CNY500,000, the deposits shall be paid in full. The portion in excess of CNY500,000 shall be paid with the liquidated property of the institutional policyholder.
Upon paying the insured deposits of a depositor, the Deposit Insurance Fund Management Co. Ltd. acquires the depositor's claim against the institutional policyholder in the same order of liquidation.
Main Requirements
According to the Law on Commercial Banks, in handling individual savings deposits, commercial banks shall maintain confidentiality for depositors. No employee of a commercial bank may divulge any state or commercial secret they acquire during their term of service.
According to the Implementation Measures of the PBOC for Protecting Financial Consumers' Rights and Interests, the bank or payment institution and its employees shall keep consumers' financial information strictly confidential, and shall not divulge or illegally provide such information to any other person. When it is confirmed that the information is divulged, damaged or lost, the bank or payment institution shall immediately take remedial measures; if the leakage, damage or loss of information is likely to endanger the personal or property safety of financial consumers, the bank or payment institution shall immediately report to the PBOC branch office at the place of its domicile and inform financial consumers. If the leakage, damage or loss of information may have any other adverse impact on financial consumers, the institution shall inform financial consumers in a timely manner, and report to the PBOC branch office at the place of its domicile within 72 hours. After receiving the report, the PBOC branch office shall handle it in accordance with Article 55 (see below) of these Measures, as the case may be.
Pursuant to the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC, and on the basis of the purposes and methods of the processing of personal information, categories of personal information, the impacts on individuals' rights and interests, and potential security risks, personal information processors including banking institutions shall take the following measures to ensure that personal information-processing activities comply with the provisions of laws and administrative regulations, and prevent unauthorised access to and the leakage, tampering or loss of personal information:
Where leakage, tampering or loss of personal information occurs or may occur, a personal information processor (including banking institutions) shall immediately take remedial measures and notify the authority performing personal information protection functions and the relevant individuals. The notice shall include the following matters:
Principal Exceptions
According to the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC, personal information processors, including banking institutions, may process personal information without obtaining personal consent under the following circumstances:
Where laws provide for the processing of personal information in the process of statistical or archive administration activities organised and implemented by the people's governments at various levels and relevant departments thereof, such provisions shall prevail.
Consequences of Breach
According to the Law on Commercial Banks, any employee of a commercial bank divulging state or commercial secrets acquired during service shall be subject to a disciplinary punishment or to criminal liabilities if the act is so serious as to constitute a crime.
According to Article 55 of the Implementation Measures of the PBOC for Protecting Financial Consumers' Rights and Interests, where a bank or payment institution infringes upon financial consumers' lawful rights and interests, such as divulging, damaging or tampering with financial consumers’ personal information, the PBOC or its branch office may take the following measures:
On 3 May 2011, the CBIRC issued the Guiding Opinions on the Implementation of New Regulatory Standards in China’s Banking Sector. In June 2012, the Administrative Measures for the Capital of Commercial Banks (for Trial Implementation) was launched, marking the beginning of China’s formal implementation of the Basel Agreement III. In 2015, the CBIRC launched the Measures for the Liquidity Risk Management of Commercial Banks, which was amended in 2018. The regulatory requirements set by the CBIRC cover the requirements of Basel III standards, and most banks have already met these requirements.
Quantity and Quality of Capital Requirements
According to the Administrative Measures for the Capital of Commercial Banks (for Trial Implementation), capital adequacy ratio regulation requirements for commercial banks include a minimum capital requirement, a capital reservation buffer and countercyclical capital requirements, an additional capital requirement for systemically important banks (SIBs) and a capital requirement under the Second Pillar.
Commercial banks' capital adequacy ratio at each tier must meet the following minimum requirements:
A commercial bank shall hold a capital reservation buffer in addition to the minimum capital requirements, which shall amount to 2.5% of the bank’s risk-weighted assets and be fulfilled by Core Tier 1 capital.
Under specified circumstances, a commercial bank shall hold countercyclical capital in addition to the minimum capital requirement and the capital reservation buffer requirement. Countercyclical capital shall amount to 0–2.5% of the bank’s risk-weighted assets and be fulfilled by Core Tier 1 capital.
In September 2022, the PBOC and the CBIRC released the updated list of China’s SIBs for 2022. According to the Provisions on the Additional Regulation of SIBs (for Trial Implementation), SIBs classified in the first to fifth group are subject to additional capital requirements of 0.25%, 0.5%, 0.75%, 1% and 1.5%, respectively. If a bank is identified as both a China SIB and a global SIB, the additional capital requirement is determined on the principle of the higher of the two. The additional capital requirement shall be fulfilled by Core Tier 1 capital.
As for the capital requirements under the Second Pillar, in light of the operational risk management level or the occurrence of operational risk events of a single commercial bank, the CBIRC has the power to determine or raise the regulatory capital requirements for operational risk.
Liquidity Requirements
Pursuant to the Measures for the Liquidity Risk Management of Commercial Banks, liquidity risk supervisory indicators include liquidity coverage ratio (LCR), net stable funding ratio (NSFR), liquidity ratio, liquidity matching ratio and adequacy ratio of high-quality liquid asset (HQLA).
A commercial bank with an asset size of not less than CNY200 billion shall continuously meet the minimum supervisory standards for LCR, NSFR, liquidity ratio and liquidity matching ratio. A commercial bank with an asset size of less than CNY200 billion shall continuously meet the minimum supervisory standards for adequacy ratio of HQLA, liquidity ratio and liquidity matching ratio. Upon approval by the CBIRC, it must only meet the requirements of LCR and NSFR.
LCR is designed to ensure that a commercial bank has adequate qualifying HQLA that can be monetised to meet the future liquidity needs of, at a minimum, 30 days under the liquidity stress scenarios as prescribed. The minimum supervisory standard of LCR is no lower than 100%.
NSFR is designed to ensure that a commercial bank has adequate sources of stable funds to meet the needs of various types of assets and off-balance-sheet risk exposure for stable funds. The minimum supervisory standard of NSFR is no lower than 100%.
Liquidity matching ratio, which measures the maturity allocation structure of the major assets and liabilities of commercial banks, is designed to direct commercial banks to rationally allocate long-term stable liabilities and high-liquidity or short-term assets, avoid over-reliance on short-term funds in supporting the development of long-term business, and improve their capacity to withstand liquidity risk. The minimum supervisory standard of liquidity matching ratio is no lower than 100%.
Adequacy ratio of HQLA is designed to ensure that a commercial bank maintains adequate unencumbered HQLA that can be monetised to meet the future liquidity needs within the coming 30 days in times of stress. The minimum supervisory standard of the adequacy ratio of HQLA is no lower than 100%.
The liquidity ratio of a bank shall not be lower than 25%.
Risk Management Rules
Risk management rules on quantity and quality of capital requirements
According to the Administrative Measures for the Capital of Commercial Banks (for Trial Implementation), commercial banks shall meet the following requirements:
The CBIRC implements supervisory inspection on capital adequacy ratios of commercial banks to ensure that their capital is able to sufficiently cover all risks facing them. Supervisory inspection on capital adequacy ratios includes but is not limited to:
The information disclosure of the capital adequacy ratio shall cover at least the following:
Risk management rules on liquidity requirements
According to the Measures for the Liquidity Risk Management of Commercial Banks, a commercial bank shall, at the legal entity and group levels, establish a liquidity risk management system commensurate with the scale, nature and complexity of its business. The liquidity risk management system shall include the following basic elements:
The CBIRC conducts analysis and monitoring of the liquidity risk of commercial banks and the banking system on a regular basis, in terms of the asset liability maturity mismatch, the degree of diversification and the stability of funding sources, unencumbered assets, the liquidity risk profile of significant currencies of commercial banks, and market liquidity, among others. It shall take into full consideration the limitations of a single liquidity risk supervisory indicator or monitoring tool in reflecting the liquidity risk of commercial banks, and make comprehensive use of a variety of methods and tools to analyse and monitor liquidity risk. In consideration of the development strategies, it may assess the market positioning, business model, asset and liability structure and risk management capability of a commercial bank, set differentiated monitoring early warning values or early warning intervals for all or part of the monitoring tools and, at the appropriate time, issue risk alerts or require the bank to take relevant measures.
As for the disclosure requirement, the Measures for the Liquidity Risk Management of Commercial Banks require that a commercial bank shall, according to the applicable provisions, disclose information on its liquidity risk level and the management status thereof on a regular basis, including but not limited to the following:
Additional Requirements Applicable to SIBs
As well as the additional capital requirement, the Provisions on the Additional Regulation of SIBs (for Trial Implementation) imposes further regulatory requirements on China’s SIBs.
A SIB shall satisfy additional leverage ratio requirements in addition to the general leverage ratio requirements. The additional leverage ratio requirement is 50% of the additional capital requirement for SIBs, which shall be met by Tier 1 capital.
The PBOC strengthens the monitoring, analysis and risk assessment of SIBs on the basis of consolidation, including:
The CBIRC implements consolidated supervision and administration, and imposes strengthened supervision requirements on SIBs in accordance with the law.
The Principal Means of Resolving a Failing Bank
According to the Law on Commercial Banks, where a commercial bank is unable to pay the debts due, it may be adjudicated bankrupt by a PRC court according to law, with the consent of the CBIRC. In this process, the court shall co-ordinate with the CBIRC and other relevant departments and personnel to form a liquidation group. In the bankruptcy liquidation of a commercial bank, after paying the liquidation expenses, salaries and labour insurance fees of its employees, the bank shall prioritise paying the principal and interest on individual savings deposits.
The Financial Stability Board Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes
In June 2021, the CBIRC formulated the Notice of Issuing the Interim Measure for the Implementation of Recovery and Resolution Plans of Banking and Insurance Institution (the "Measures for the Implementation of RRP"), in response to the Financial Stability Board key attributes of effective resolution regimes, to systemically arrange the identification, supervision and resolution of systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs).
A banking institution that meets the following conditions shall make recovery and resolution plans as required by the Measures for the Implementation of RRP:
The RRP made or updated by a banking institution shall be subject to approval by the board of directors, except as otherwise prescribed by the CBIRC. The board of directors shall assume ultimate responsibility for the formulation and update of the RRP, the senior management shall assume management responsibility, and shareholders shall assume shareholder’s responsibility in accordance with laws, regulations or the institution’s articles of associations.
The CBIRC and its local offices are responsible for regulating the formulation and implementation of RRP by banking institutions, and shall share the RRP of banking institutions with the PBOC, the Deposit Insurance Fund Management Co. Ltd., the China Security Regulatory Committee, the MOF and local governments, among other entities.
Where the regulatory requirements for the RRP of global or domestic SIFIs are otherwise provided for, such provisions shall prevail.
Insolvency Preference Rules Applicable to Deposits
As mentioned above, the insolvency preference rules applicable to deposits are stipulated in the Law on Commercial Banks, according to which the bankrupt commercial bank shall, after paying liquidation expenses, salaries and labour insurance fees, pay in priority the principals and interests of individual savings deposits.
Regulating Internet Financial Services
The CBIRC has recently issued the following, which have had a disruptive impact on internet finance:
The CBIRC has always adhered to the following principles for the rectification of online platforms’ financial business:
Focus will be put on supporting network platform enterprises in upholding innovation and standardising development under the premise of prudential supervision, and at the same time resolutely breaking up any monopoly.
The main purposes of these policies are to:
These policies will completely change the business model of internet companies relying on the advantages of technology, high leverage and high returns.
Lifting Restrictions on Foreign Shareholdings in the Banking Sector
Since 2018, restrictions on foreign funds holding equity in the banking sector have been gradually abolished. According to the CBIRC, as of the end of May 2022, there were 41 foreign-funded banks, 116 branches of foreign banks and 134 representative offices in China. BlackRock CCB Wealth Management (a joint venture of BlackRock Financial Management and China Construction Bank subsidiary CCB Wealth Management) was approved by the CBIRC to launch pension products. The Hong Kong-established Dah Sing Bank was licensed to form its Shenzhen branch in addition to its PRC subsidiary, Dah Sing Bank (China) Limited, becoming the first foreign bank to be granted "double licences" by Chinese regulators. China is unprecedentedly willing to welcome foreign funds participating in its financial market.
Improving the Protection of Financial Consumer Rights
In September 2020, the PBOC issued the Implementation Measures for Protecting Financial Consumers' Rights and Interests. In July 2021, the CBIRC issued the Measures for the Supervision and Evaluation of the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests of Banking Insurance Institutions. Such regulations require financial institutions to:
At the same time, with the enactment of the Personal Information Protection Law of the PRC, the responsibilities of financial institutions in terms of protecting personal financial information have become stricter. When collecting personal financial information, financial institutions shall follow the principles of lawfulness, reasonableness and necessity, strictly fulfilling the obligation to maintain information confidentiality and properly comply with laws, regulations and the scope authorised by the individual to process, store and use personal financial information.
Strengthening the Compliance Risk Management of Digital Financial Services
Financial regulatory agencies are strengthening their supervision on financial technology and formulating higher compliance requirements for commercial banks carrying out digital financial services. Many commercial banks have previously experienced risk incidents and suffered heavy penalties due to loopholes in their compliance and internal control mechanisms. For this reason, commercial banks should strengthen their compliance risk management.
To boost the development of green finance and better assist in the endeavour to prevent and control pollution, the CBIRC recently released the Notice of Issuing the Guidelines on Green Finance for the Banking and Insurance Industries, under which banking institutions are required to increase support for the green, low-carbon and circular economies and prevent ESG risk. Banking institutions shall formulate ESG risk assessment standards for clients and conduct classified management and dynamic assessment of client risks, the result of which shall be used as an important basis for client rating, access to loans, and client management and withdrawal. Prior to the grant of loans to an investment project, a list of compliance documents and a compliance risk examination list with respect to ESG shall be prepared and reviewed by the bank to confirm clients are paying sufficient attention to – and having effective dynamic control over – the relevant risk points.
According to the Plan for the Green Finance Evaluation of Banking Financial Institutions issued by the PBOC in May 2021, the green finance evaluation of 24 major banks include quantitative and qualitative indicators, with a weight of 80% and 20%, respectively. The former covers the ratio of the total amount of green financial services, the share of the total amount of green financial services, the year-on-year growth rate of the total amount of green financial services and the ratio of total risk amount of the green financial services. The latter is determined by the PBOC in light of, among others, the daily management and risk control based on the qualitative indicator system.
34th Floor, Tower 3
China Central Place
77 Jianguo Road
Chaoyang District
Beijing
China
+86 10 5809 1234
+86 10 5809 1100
jjwu@jingtian.com www.jingtian.comChina Opens Door to TLAC-eligible Instruments
Introduction
Total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) refers to the total amount of capital and debt instruments that may absorb losses by write-down or conversion into equity when a global systemically important bank (G-SIB) enters a bail-in resolution. In November 2015, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) published the Principles on Loss-absorbing and Recapitalisation Capacity of G-SIBs in Resolution and the Total Loss-absorbing Capacity Term Sheet (the "TLAC Term Sheet"), according to which G-SIBs have needed to hold total TLAC equivalent to 16% of total risk-weighted assets (RWA) and 6% of the Basel III leverage ratio denominator since 1 January 2019. The bar has been further raised to 18% and 6.75%, respectively, as from 1 January 2022. G-SIBs headquartered in an emerging market economy (EME) are given an additional six years to comply.
To be in line with the TLAC Term Sheet, China has been getting ready for TLAC compliance. In October 2021, the People’s Bank of China (PBOC), the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) and the Ministry of Finance (MOF) jointly issued the Administrative Measures on the Total Loss-absorbing Capacity of Global Systemically Important Banks (the "TLAC Administrative Measures") to implement the international TLAC standard for Chinese G-SIBs. The TLAC Administrative Measures have been effective since 1 December 2021 (except for certain provisions, noted below).
In a follow-up development, on 26 April 2022, the PBOC and the CBIRC jointly released the Notice of Matters Concerning the Issuance of Non-capital Bonds for Total Loss-absorbing Capacity by Global Systemically Important Banks (the "Notice of TLAC Non-capital Bonds") in parallel with the TLAC Administrative Measures, allowing the "Big Four" banks (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, Agricultural Bank of China, Bank of China and China Construction Bank) to issue loss-absorbing bonds. Being home to EME’s only G-SIBs, China is on track to tailor-make TLAC-eligible instruments based on the unique features of its banking system.
Incorporation of FSB framework into Chinese regime
With respect to the clarification of TLAC regulatory indicators and minimum regulatory requirements, the regulation of TLAC composition and standards for eligible TLAC instruments, the specification of TLAC deduction rules and supervision requirements, China’s TLAC Administrative Measures align closely with the FSB framework and, at the same time, demonstrate Chinese characteristics.
The Minimum External TLAC requirement
The Minimum External TLAC requirement, including the risk-weighted ratio and the leverage ratio, applies to consolidated resolution groups of Chinese G-SIBs. A resolution group consists of a resolution entity to which resolution tools will be applied, and entities owned or controlled by the resolution entity, either directly or indirectly. The risk-weighted ratio (ie, TLAC instruments subject to deduction divided by the resolution group’s RWA) must be at least 16% as of 1 January 2025 (phase I) and 18% as of 1 January 2028 (phase II). The leverage ratio (ie, TLAC instruments subject to deduction divided by the Basel III leverage ratio denominator) must be at least 6% in phase I, and reach 6.75% when the requirements are fully phased in.
Since the Minimum External TLAC does not include any applicable regulatory capital (Basel III) buffers, Chinese G-SIBs are now exposed to much higher capital requirements. Without considering applicable exemption (illustrated below), the actual adequacy ratio for Chinese G-SIBs (except Agricultural Bank of China) will have to be no less than 20% of total RWA come 2025 (including TLAC of 16%, a specific capital surcharge of 1.5%, a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% and a countercyclical capital buffer of, for the time being, 0%). The requirement for Agricultural Bank of China will be 19.5% due to its bucket-1 position.
The PBOC and the CBIRC have authority to impose additional firm-specific prudential regulations if any situation so requires.
Excluded liabilities
Pursuant to Article 16 of the TLAC Administrative Measures, the following liabilities are excluded from external TLAC ("excluded liabilities"):
External TLAC composition
Under the Chinese regime, external TLAC of G-SIBs consist of three components. In addition to the regulatory capital required by the CBIRC with a minimum remaining maturity of more than one year (or being perpetual), which constitutes the most significant part of external TLAC of Chinese G-SIBs, TLAC-eligible non-capital debt instruments may also be fully counted towards external TLAC if they:
Similar to Japan, which exercises the exemption under Section 7 of the TLAC Term Sheet (credible ex-ante commitments), deposit insurance funding managed by China’s Deposit Insurance Fund Management Company (DIFMC) is considered TLAC-eligible and will be counted up to 2.5% and 3.5% of a Chinese G-SIB’s RWA when the minimum TLAC risk-weighted ratio is 16% and 18%, respectively. However, unlike their Japanese peers, the TLAC requirement for Chinese G-SIBs will not be as effectively reduced when the time comes, in part due to their sheer size. According to the PBOC, the deposit insurance fund managed by the DIFMC had a balance of CNY96 billion (UDS15.14 billion) at the end of 2021, making a contribution of around 0.13% of RWA to the Big Four.
External TLAC deduction
The TLAC Administrative Measures provide for deductions from TLAC-eligible instruments to address the high degree of uncertainty regarding the positive loss-absorbing capacity of these items in periods of resolution, and are mostly applied to self-holdings and cross-holdings of TLAC instruments by G-SIBs. The existing deduction rules on regulatory capital required by the CBIRC also apply to TLAC capital instruments. Important deductions include goodwill and other intangible assets, net deferred tax assets and shortfall of loan loss reserves.
TLAC non-capital debt instruments issued and held (either directly or indirectly) by a G-SIB, or investments determined by the PBOC as inflated external TLAC non-capital debt instruments, must be deducted from that G-SIB’s external TLAC. To reduce the risk of contagion, cross-holdings of external TLAC non-capital debt instruments by G-SIBs through agreements must be fully deducted first from the Tier 2 capital and then the capital of a higher tier.
It is worth noting that investments by a G-SIB in other G-SIBs’ external TLAC instruments will not be subject to capital deduction until 1 January 2030. Instead, RWA should be calculated in accordance with the provisions of the TLAC Administrative Measures.
Internal TLAC requirement
According to the FSB’s definition, internal TLAC refers to loss-absorbing capacity that a resolution entity has committed to material sub-groups. Although the TLAC Term Sheet has provided guidelines for internal TLAC requirements and material sub-groups consideration, China’s TLAC Administration Measures left them blank for future roll-out.
Regulatory supervision
The PBOC, the CBIRC and the MOF are responsible for supervising and inspecting the implementation of the TLAC Administration Measures by Chinese G-SIBs, to ensure the sufficiency of loss-absorbing capacity and the continuity of critical businesses and functions in resolution, and to prevent systemic financial risks. Chinese G-SIBs are required to report external TLAC indicators to regulators on a quarterly basis, and to submit a report on the implementation of TLAC requirements within four months of the end of each year.
Final provisions
With recovery measures being adopted, if a G-SIB concludes an agreement with its creditors to convert debt into equity to consummate capital reorganisation without entry of resolution, it is still designated as a G-SIB by the FSB, and must re-satisfy the external TLAC requirements within two years from the date of the agreement. Any G-SIB that enters resolution but is still designated as a G-SIB by the FSB should re-satisfy the external TLAC requirements within two years from the ending of the resolution. As of 1 January 2022, any commercial bank that is designated as a G-SIB must fulfil TLAC requirements within three years from the date of designation.
The TLAC Administrative Measures also cover a China-formed subsidiary determined as a resolution entity, whose parent is an overseas-based commercial bank and is designated as a G-SIB by the FSB.
TLAC non-capital bonds at the corner
Although Chinese G-SIBs have been given six more years than their global peers to prepare for TLAC compliance, they still have to explore more TLAC-eligible instruments since the clock has stared ticking and capital is being rapidly consumed. The assumption of national missions such as financial reform and the Belt and Road Initiative impose large demands on the Big Four’s credit supply, making it difficult for them to increase TLAC ratios by shrinking balance sheets.
In addition, the requirement to transfer some off-balance products back to banks’ balance sheets and include them in ordinary corporate loans with 100% risk weight not only enlarges the size of general credit but also causes certain capital consumption for banks. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in more capital being used to absorb losses caused by greater pressure on banks’ asset quality. According to security analysts, assuming a 9% annual growth rate of RWA and without considering any applicable exemptions, the total external TLAC gap of the Big Four banks is estimated to be around CNY1.93 trillion in 2022, CNY2.26 trillion in 2023 and CNY2.62 trillion in 2024.
The release of the Notice of TLAC Non-capital Bonds is a positive signal that China is taking concrete steps to meet TLAC requirements by 2025. Under the FSB TLAC framework, the sum of TLAC-eligible instruments of a G-SIB’s resolution entity or entities is expected to represent a minimum of 33% of their Minimum External TLAC requirement.
It is worth noting that TLAC-eligible instruments consist of two components: Tier 1 and Tier 2 regulatory capital instruments in the form of debt liabilities (capital debt instruments), and other TLAC-eligible instruments that are not also eligible as regulatory capital (non-capital debt instruments). Such regulatory expectation was not adopted by China when the TLAC Administrative Measures were enacted in 2021. Analysts have suggested that this might be because there had been capital debt instruments including common stock, preferred stock, convertible bonds, perpetual bonds and write-down Tier 2 capital bonds but no non-capital debt instruments in the Chinese market. International G-SIBs generally began to issue eligible TLAC instruments about three years prior to phase I TLAC compliance. Therefore, it is foreseeable that the release of the Notice of TLAC Non-capital Bonds will be followed by a peak of bond issuance by the four G-SIBs.
The issuance of TLAC non-capital bonds does not mean creating a totally new financial instrument, but only ensuring that the basic terms and the payment sequence comply with the TLAC regulatory requirements. According to the Notice of TLAC Non-capital Bonds, the order of repayment of TLAC non-capital bonds is inferior to the excluded liabilities as specified in the TLAC Administrative Measures but takes precedence over eligible capital instruments at all levels.
Write-down or conversion to equity clauses must be contained in the TLAC non-capital bonds so that the PBOC and the CBIRC may put forward mandatory requirements for an exercise should a G-SIB enter resolution, and Tier 2 capital instruments are all written down or converted into common shares. Other matters concerning the issuance of TLAC non-capital bonds not specified by the Notice are in line with the existing rules governing financial bonds issued in the inter-bank bond market.
The issuance of TLAC non-capital bonds will improve a G-SIB’s loss-absorbing capacity and protect common creditors’ interest. During the lifecycle of a G-SIB from going-concern to entering resolution and finally becoming bankrupt, losses will be absorbed in an order of Basel III buffer, core Tier 1 capital, additional Tier 1 capital, Tier 2 capital, TLAC non-capital bonds and, lastly, resolution funds that are non-eligible for TLAC.
Conclusion
As the largest banks globally prepare for TLAC rules, Chinese regulators are tailoring requirements in acknowledgement of China's less developed market to facilitate the TLAC compliance of G-SIBs. As state-owned banks, there is low probability of the Big Four entering resolution, but they have to pay extra regulatory costs. As phase I of the TLAC compliance requirement approaches, Chinese regulators are providing more channels for banks to issue TLAC non-capital debt instruments in order to close the funding gap.
34th Floor, Tower 3
China Central Place
77 Jianguo Road
Chaoyang District
Beijing
China
+86 10 5809 1234
+86 10 5809 1100
jjwu@jingtian.com www.jingtian.com